From b3a00a8206490fdf92762b1db86a06348582b4f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Paul Weber Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:17:44 -0500 Subject: s2k values are really optional, not undefined Should they be grouped in some way? Should encrypted_data also be grouped with them in some way? --- tests/suite.hs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tests') diff --git a/tests/suite.hs b/tests/suite.hs index 17ab3cb..7ea5e57 100644 --- a/tests/suite.hs +++ b/tests/suite.hs @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ tests secring = testCase "000076-007.secret_subkey" (testSerialization "000076-007.secret_subkey"), testCase "000077-002.sig" (testSerialization "000077-002.sig"), testCase "000078-012.ring_trust" (testSerialization "000078-012.ring_trust"), - -- Issue #11 -- testCase "secring.gpg" (testSerialization "secring.gpg"), testCase "pubring.gpg" (testSerialization "pubring.gpg"), + testCase "secring.gpg" (testSerialization "secring.gpg"), testCase "compressedsig.gpg" (testSerialization "compressedsig.gpg"), testCase "compressedsig-zlib.gpg" (testSerialization "compressedsig-zlib.gpg"), testCase "compressedsig-bzip2.gpg" (testSerialization "compressedsig-bzip2.gpg"), -- cgit v1.2.3