Handle SELinux authorisation roles

Rejected upstream due to discomfort with magic usernames; a better approach
will need an SSH protocol change.  In the meantime, this came from Debian's
SELinux maintainer, so we'll keep it until we have something better.

Bug: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1641
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/394795
Last-Update: 2015-08-19

Patch-Name: selinux-role.patch

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c b/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c
index f36999d7a..f9cdc15c3 100644
--- a/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c
+++ b/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 
+#ifdef WITH_SELINUX
+#include "key.h"
+#include "hostfile.h"
+#include "auth.h"
+#endif
+
 #include "log.h"
 #include "xmalloc.h"
 #include "port-linux.h"
@@ -58,7 +64,7 @@ ssh_selinux_enabled(void)
 
 /* Return the default security context for the given username */
 static security_context_t
-ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(char *pwname)
+ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(char *pwname, const char *role)
 {
         security_context_t sc = NULL;
         char *sename = NULL, *lvl = NULL;
@@ -73,9 +79,16 @@ ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(char *pwname)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef HAVE_GET_DEFAULT_CONTEXT_WITH_LEVEL
-        r = get_default_context_with_level(sename, lvl, NULL, &sc);
+        if (role != NULL && role[0])
+                r = get_default_context_with_rolelevel(sename, role, lvl, NULL,
+                                                       &sc);
+        else
+                r = get_default_context_with_level(sename, lvl, NULL, &sc);
 #else
-        r = get_default_context(sename, NULL, &sc);
+        if (role != NULL && role[0])
+                r = get_default_context_with_role(sename, role, NULL, &sc);
+        else
+                r = get_default_context(sename, NULL, &sc);
 #endif
 
         if (r != 0) {
@@ -105,7 +118,7 @@ ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(char *pwname)
 
 /* Set the execution context to the default for the specified user */
 void
-ssh_selinux_setup_exec_context(char *pwname)
+ssh_selinux_setup_exec_context(char *pwname, const char *role)
 {
         security_context_t user_ctx = NULL;
 
@@ -114,7 +127,7 @@ ssh_selinux_setup_exec_context(char *pwname)
 
         debug3("%s: setting execution context", __func__);
 
-        user_ctx = ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(pwname);
+        user_ctx = ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(pwname, role);
         if (setexeccon(user_ctx) != 0) {
                 switch (security_getenforce()) {
                 case -1:
@@ -136,7 +149,7 @@ ssh_selinux_setup_exec_context(char *pwname)
 
 /* Set the TTY context for the specified user */
 void
-ssh_selinux_setup_pty(char *pwname, const char *tty)
+ssh_selinux_setup_pty(char *pwname, const char *tty, const char *role)
 {
         security_context_t new_tty_ctx = NULL;
         security_context_t user_ctx = NULL;
@@ -147,7 +160,7 @@ ssh_selinux_setup_pty(char *pwname, const char *tty)
 
         debug3("%s: setting TTY context on %s", __func__, tty);
 
-        user_ctx = ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(pwname);
+        user_ctx = ssh_selinux_getctxbyname(pwname, role);
 
         /* XXX: should these calls fatal() upon failure in enforcing mode? */