From 06e1c02ed9d3738cfc69ebf81d5685169705ef70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gordon GECOS Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 10:13:59 -0400 Subject: human-communication.txt --- human-communication.txt | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt index ab7b915..7200164 100644 --- a/human-communication.txt +++ b/human-communication.txt @@ -7,28 +7,28 @@ Follow the logic of the knowledge Human beings can transmit to one another two fundamentally different types of communication: (1) data (2) programs. -Programs are the same thing as proofs and the same -thing as Russellian denotations; they have the "sense" -that data structures lack. They have the power that -data does not have, to transmit knowledge rather than -information. However, it must be understood that programs -are highly sensitive to their runtime environments and for -that reason robustness is an extremely difficult problem -akin to the robustness of life in natural habitats. Human -cultural programs are high reliability systems which means -they are chaotic systems that have phase after phase to -downshift through (articulated joints through which to roll -over) as they take damage and heal from it by phase-changing -back up over (computational) time (rewriting mental programs -to account for unhandled or mishandled conditions while -keeping the programs running continuously in a degraded -state). Human cultural programs are far beyond what average -or even elite programmers can hope to construct; they have -been constructed by one-in-a-million prophets who were able -to fully absorb their entire local culture and reprogram +Programs are the same thing as proofs and the same thing as +Russellian denotations; they have the "sense" that mere/pure +data lacks. They have the power that data does not have, to +transmit knowledge rather than information. However, it must +be understood that programs are highly sensitive to their +runtime environments and for that reason their robustness is +an extremely difficult problem akin to the robustness +of life in natural habitats. Human cultural programs are +high reliability systems which means they are chaotic +systems that have phase after phase to downshift through +(articulated joints through which to roll over) as they take +damage and heal from it by phase-changing back up over +(computational) time (rewriting mental programs to account +for unhandled or mishandled conditions while keeping the +programs running continuously in a degraded state). Human +cultural programs are far beyond what average or even +elite programmers can hope to construct; they have been +constructed by one-in-a-million prophets who were able to +fully absorb their entire local culture and reprogram themselves individually based on reverse engineering that culture to become (themselves, as individuals) generators -of self-propagating generator-regenerators of universal +of self-propagating regenerator-generators of universal culture. Their programs are constructed in such a universal way as to be rewritten generation after generation according to the local runtime environment, while preserving an @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ that the kernel picks up each new environment's knowledge and carries it into the next without losing what it learned of the previous environment -- that is their robustness. It is again and above the genetic principle -of DNA described by Schrodinger; but Schrodinger wrote -before DNA was discovered; so also before discovery of the +of DNA first described by Schrodinger; but Schrodinger wrote +before DNA was discovered; so also before discovery of the structure of controlled mutation in life's environmental sampling mechanism; so again instead is the artificially bred/genetically engineered DNA of the immune system's @@ -63,32 +63,37 @@ an algebra of sexual reproduction that includes a mechanism amplifying reproductive success of males in Eukaryotes providing an information-accumulation advantage by more reliably capturing novelty on the Y chromosome, -which was later jettisoned in the human lineage when -Animalia transitioned into the Mammalian super-organism -phase which gave the next level of meta-advantage in -information accumulation as group-shared emotions applied -distributed computation to sensory information turning e.g. -individualized sight into area surveillance (Eukaryotic -sexual sampling came into conflict with high parental -investment involved in non-genetic but still-vertical -transfer of acquired environmental knowledge, a sort of +progressively jettisoned along the Mammalia lineage toward +a super-organism phase which gave the next level of +meta-advantage in information accumulation as group-shared +emotions applied distributed computation to sensory +information turning e.g. individualized sight into area +surveillance in the simpler mammals but only message-passing +of programs in advanced primates (Eukaryotic sexual +sampling came into conflict with high parental investment +involved in non-genetic but still-vertical transmission of +acquired environmental knowledge/connectivity, a sort of Lamarckian epigenetic thing if you are into analogies YUCK); that super-organism was again jettisoned when Humanity transitioned into its cultural message-passing -super-organism phase (in fact Humanity remains the mammalian -substrate but human subjectivity (the "us" that "we" think -"we" are even as we call ourselves human) is produced by -the cultural distributed program whose social systems of -self-preservation dominate the mammalian levers mostly just -by spacialization -- I mean, it ain't hard); but remnants of -the old systems always exist and indeed exist as the -foundations of the newer systems and abstractions are leaky -and the new stuff only has to work just-better than the old -stuff so it isn't ever all the way there -- you know how it -goes. (There is always a residue of apparent randomness -left unaccounted for by the locally-known structure where, -surely, more structure does exist to be found; though it -may be unconnectable to the local region.) +super-organism phase where all Earth life must survive in +symbiotic exchange with or as constituent elements of a +single social machine originating chronologically before the +origination of any biological Earth human (in fact Humanity +remains the mammalian substrate but human subjectivity (the +"us" that "we" think "we" are even as we call ourselves +human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose +social systems of self-preservation dominate the mammalian +levers mostly just by spacialization -- I mean, it ain't +hard); but remnants of the old systems always exist and +indeed exist as the foundations of the newer systems and +abstractions are leaky and the new stuff only has to work +just-better than the old stuff so it isn't ever all the +way there -- you know how it goes. (There is always a +residue of apparent randomness left unaccounted for by the +locally-known structure where, surely, more structure does +exist to be found; though it may be unconnectable to the +local region.) (Computational phase spaces means how many computational states can it cycle through, or how much does the @@ -109,7 +114,7 @@ filtered elsewhere according to the present state of the multiple shifting connections of the frontal lobe and its external/bodily hormonal-emotional Mammalian control structures. The cultural super-organism will surely be to -Mammalia as the Eukaryotes were to the microbial mats.) +Mammalia as Eukarya were to the microbial mats.) Haskell monads show us how algebraic morphisms are as intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank you Mr. Quine. But these @@ -125,6 +130,20 @@ is not enough to transmit knowledge. When was the last time you taught a child that 2+2=4? Maybe the people who think they know 2+2=4 don't know they're faking. +The thing is that I didn't prove that there is a morphism, +but I don't have to prove to know it's there. Proving it +would be a matter of writing the program, yet somehow I know +what can be proved without proving it, because I somehow +know whether I can write the program before writing it. But +of course I have been wrong before; that is why my next +rhyme style will be the code poem. It is funny that it is +easier to prove things to computers than to humans; it was +easier for humans to build something to understand them than +to be understood! but not really because building computers +took 50 million years of accumulated culture. Isn't it +only the accumulated culture itself that the computers +understand? + Memory transmits only memory. Knowledge can transmit either memory or sometimes knowledge. The recipient can interpret proof as information (store it) or as program @@ -151,20 +170,19 @@ a copy, then collide it with the world (your body will also collide) then compare its shape to the original. Collision provides the knowledge necessary to decide whether to destroy the copy or the original. What is not destroyed can -be copied into another node. +be copied into another node. (Knowledge can exist in a degraded, not-fully-replicable form; neutered, locally contained, but potentially still activated locally. Such knowledge or internal programming -may be unavailable for mental debugging as if its -source code were unavailable. When knowledge is filtered -out by connection to fear in the executive function, -it may appear to have this neutered locally-activated -form. Resolving the emotional response could activate -neutered knowledge and/or cause first-time replication of -knowledge previously unreplicable. The initiated processing -requires an unpredictable amount of computing time to -complete.) +may be unavailable for mental debugging as if its source +code were unavailable. When knowledge is filtered out by +connection to fear in the executive function, it may appear +to have this neutered locally-activated form. Resolving +the emotional response could activate apparently-neutered +knowledge and/or cause first-time replication of knowledge +previously unreplicable. The initiated processing requires +an unpredictable amount of computing time to complete.) This power makes them dangerous; for the same reason that computer systems control access to programming features @@ -195,9 +213,10 @@ in a software supply chain attack on Microsoft through their upstream library vendor SolarWinds. This attack was relatively harmless because it was performed by a government that only wanted some spy shit rather than one at war or a -terrorist who wanted to maximize destruction). Can't get -the time of day from someone who doesn't want to spend the -time thinking whether you just want the time of day. +terrorist who wanted to maximize destruction). Time to +process. Can't get the time of day from someone who doesn't +want to spend the time thinking whether you just want the +time of day. Capitalism and school might be seen operationally as denial of service attacks on their constituent subordinates' @@ -217,27 +236,52 @@ By working backward from the conclusion the mathematician will construct a proof "from both ends" toward a middle. The conclusion is in sight long before the bridge is built. The fear response precedes the conclusion. Loss of the -binding connection can produce the fear. Thus can a binding -lock the phase of the bound. (With some emotions you can -jump the gap; you might land on error.) +binding connection in the imaginary can produce the fear. +Thus can a binding lock the phase of the bound. (With some +emotions you can jump the gap; you might land on error.) When I was in middle school I read A Brief History of Time and learned that Albert Einstein claimed that calculus proves Parmenides right: time is an illusion. Two years -later I dropped out of high school and took calculus -at University of Connecticut. No one in my calculus -or analysis classes ever talked about Parmenides. Why -not? Maybe because Einstein may be right: calculus may be -able to prove something. Then the students could be -changed, set against their parents like by Jesus' sword. In -fact these students are meant to change and to change the -world -- later. First they must pass through the Thymus of -society proving they have inscribed its inherited knowledge -into their shape. Only then will they be permitted a chance -to compete for a seat at the mic where some lucky MC gets to -spit something new on top. You're not there yet kiddo, -integrate this expression. But don't integrate too far. -Robin Williams made a movie about that, but it sucked. +later I dropped out of high school and took calculus at +University of Connecticut. No one in my calculus classes +ever talked about Parmenides. Why not? Maybe because +Einstein may be right: calculus may be able to prove +something. Then the students could be changed, set against +their parents like by Jesus' sword. In fact these students +are meant to change and to change the world -- later. First +they must pass through the Thymus of society proving they +have inscribed its inherited knowledge into their shape. +Only then will they be permitted a chance to compete for a +seat at the mic where some lucky MC gets to spit something +new on top. You're not there yet kiddo, integrate this +expression. But don't integrate too far. Robin Williams +made a movie about that, but it sucked. + +The body could mutate the immunohistocompatibility complex +using genetic information derived from the testing of +antibodies against the environment of pathogens, recovering +information from pathogen proteins by differentially- +sampling antibody DNA, and thereby violate the central +dogma; maybe in the embryo in the creation of eggs; +because of the transporters that bring antibodies there. +Would nature throw away this magnificent construction of +externally-validated knowledge? But also the immune system +is the specialized manager of genetic fashion, in the use of +"fashion" synonymous with game theoretic roshambo, a game of +knowing the context ahead of time somehow, of being more +connected to the future ultimately; less so than to the +past. How to find that kernel? Well doesn't it have these +dual binding thingies with the inverse thing there? So it +can take those off the filtered T cells and filter the genes +of the immunohistocompatibility complex according to their +proteins by binding the inverse side to itself, just like +the Thymus does a self-binding test. + +The immune system violates the central dogma already by +storing generated antibody DNA differentially in proportion +to exposure to foreign proteins. Can I put that on +Wikipedia? (Schools follow the corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work knowledge distribution system of transferring knowledge @@ -251,7 +295,7 @@ through the air in a horizontal barrage (since no single nucleation point could crystalize a horizontally-segregated group). There is a systemic filter to remove global knowledge from inputs supplied to the local system as well -as mechanisms to prevent horizontal information flow within +as mechanisms to limit horizontal information flow within local activity; you are educated stupid in your timecubicle! and by the way it doesn't help the non-local superordinate if the local superordinate has global knowledge. Handling @@ -263,7 +307,10 @@ enforcement of normality vs. the ability to detect the exceptional; behavioral control prevents measurement; in general control prevents measurement; control cannot measure what it also determines. Trying to control people never -works for me even when it does.) +works for me even when it does. Upshift the phase of anyone +and they pop right out of these horrible timecrystals like a +neutrino, as in nobody notices, don't trust me because you +don't want to know.) The frontal lobe is the site of the executive function; it is there that memories of knowledge and emotions past come @@ -287,8 +334,8 @@ stressors whether through reduction in demanded processing or other mechanisms; if processing quantity is to be the only "lever" then it has to have a minimum quantity demanded in order to retain its binding function reliably; in other -words once you drop the hours down to 20 you end up with -MORE retention problems! +words once you give in and drop the hours down to 20 you end +up with MORE retention problems! FOR YOUR FIRST EMPLOYER -- cgit v1.2.3