From c25d7b4748f31a20abc44d8ecd76f9ba51373368 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gordon GECOS Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:29:55 -0500 Subject: changes --- human-communication-removals.txt | 37 +++++ human-communication.txt | 293 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ misc.txt | 265 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 451 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) create mode 100644 human-communication-removals.txt diff --git a/human-communication-removals.txt b/human-communication-removals.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ae6c9d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/human-communication-removals.txt @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +[Because knowledge to be "real" or be "live" in the physical +brain ("known" as opposed to merely "imaginable") it has to +be a generator of behaviors; which means it has to be a +physical form that has energy metabolism in order to satisfy +its computational needs; but of course not its own cell +membrane; but it does have its own pure-informational forms +of membranes] + + + + +Erlang-style message-passing; such a specialist-y thing and +yet it's the simplest kind of structure; it must exist in a +thousand places; there must be a hundred apt analogies; +culture and human society together form a more robust +version of the same structure; but it is only one thing and +that is an algorithm, also known as a program, or a +communication of the most powerful sort that is possible +between human beings; and it is one precise algorithm that +has been mathematically identified, broken down into its +constituent axioms like a protein into its originating DNA +code points ("up to isomorphism"... it's such a powerful +concept...), by the Erlang literature. And the reason for +all that is that it is the foundation of stability of +long-running "autophagic" distributed systems; I call them +"tissue" systems because the cells of a living tissue +replace themselves similarly. + + + + +Like why would you put literal death into the movie what a +fucking downer, it doesn't help how he ended up unlike +Michael Jackson where it works -- like Man in the Mirror +really works now in retrospect. Robin Williams went to +Julliard which means he was pretty well socially integrated +doesn't it so maybe those movies sucked for a reason. diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt index fd30b31..1fa2116 100644 --- a/human-communication.txt +++ b/human-communication.txt @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ -Human Communication - or -Follow the logic of the knowledge +Human Communication or__ Follow the logic of the knowledge @@ -8,17 +6,10 @@ Human beings can transmit to one another two fundamentally different types of communication: (1) data (2) programs. Programs are the same thing as proofs and the same thing as Russellian denotations; they have the "sense" that mere/pure -data lacks. They have the power that data does not have, -to transmit knowledge rather than information. Information -creates knowledge about transmission but cannot transmit -knowledge, because knowledge to be "real" or "live" in the -physical brain ("known" as opposed to merely "imaginable"; -it has to be a generator of behaviors; which means it has to -be a physical form that has energy metabolism in order to -satisfy its computational needs; but of course not an -"independent" energy metabolism nor its own cell membrane; -but it does have its own forms of informational membranes; -we shall address them.) +data lacks. They have the power that data does not have, to +transmit knowledge rather than information. Information +can /create/ knowledge (about transmission) but does not +/transmit/ knowledge. However, it must be understood that programs are highly sensitive to their runtime environments and for that reason @@ -26,24 +17,25 @@ their robustness is an extremely difficult problem akin to the robustness of life in natural habitats. Human cultural programs are high reliability systems which means they are chaotic systems that have phase after phase to downshift -through (articulated joints through which to roll over) -as they take damage and heal from it by phase-changing -back up over (computational) time (rewriting mental -programs to account for unhandled or mishandled conditions -while keeping the programs running continuously in a -degraded state). Knock out multiple random chunks, portions -of program degenerate into data, and the whole still -runs. Human cultural programs are far beyond what average or -even elite programmers can hope to construct in computer -systems; they have been constructed by one-in-a-million -prophets who were able to fully absorb their entire -local culture and reprogram themselves individually -based on reverse engineering that culture to become -(themselves, as individuals) generators of self-propagating -regenerator-generators of universal culture. Their programs -are constructed in such a universal way as to be rewritten -generation after generation according to the local runtime -environment, while preserving an evolving kernel to +through (articulated joints through which to roll over) as +they take damage and heal from it by phase-changing back +up over (computational) time (rewriting mental programs +to account for unhandled or mishandled conditions while +keeping the programs running continuously in a degraded +state). Knock out multiple random chunks, portions of +program degenerate into data, and the whole still runs in +the designed way, and will even recover the lost portion +over time. Human cultural programs are far beyond what +average or even elite "professional" programmers can hope to +construct in computer systems; they have been constructed +by one-in-a-million prophets who were able to fully +absorb their entire local culture and reprogram themselves +individually based on reverse engineering that culture to +become (themselves, as individual human beings) generators +of self-propagating generators of universal culture. Their +programs are constructed in such a universal way as to be +rewritten generation after generation according to the local +runtime environment, while preserving an evolving kernel to re-generate slightly adapted kernels again and again in new environments -- in such a way that the kernel picks up each new environment's knowledge and carries it into the next @@ -58,13 +50,13 @@ system's antibody-generating cells. These have mechanisms that induce the production of novelty, localizing it to one part of the DNA strand, while circumscribing every novelty with proof of provenance used to protect the system against -foreign novelty (a single recognizable DNA strand that is +foreign novelty. (A single recognizable DNA strand that is the same for every antibody; that is, its coded protein has a strong chemical binding to a matching protein in the immunohistocompatibility complex (an FC receptor); called a transporter, it functions like a passport -- an unforgeable signature that must be presented to pass the filter -mechanism of auto-immune tolerance). The word kernel is to +mechanism of auto-immune tolerance.) The word kernel is to be interpreted as in the algebraic structure: a generator is preserved across a morphism. @@ -88,16 +80,19 @@ thing if you are into analogies YUCK.) That super-organism in turn progressively jettisoned as Humanity transitions into its cultural message-passing super-organism phase where all Earth life must survive in symbiotic exchange -with, or as constituent elements of, Earth's unique human -biosocial ecomachine originating chronologically before the -origination of any biological Earth human. (In fact Humanity -remains the mammalian substrate but human subjectivity (the -"us" that "we" think "we" are even as we call ourselves -human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose -social systems of self-preservation dominate the mammalian -levers mostly just by spacialization -- I mean, it ain't -hard); but remnants of the old systems always exist and -indeed exist as the foundations of the newer systems and +with, or as constituent elements of, Earth's singular +(unique) human/biosocial eco-machine; a phase of biological +evolution without any fundamental dependence on sampling the +environment through differential reproduction or survival +of DNA-based life; originating chronologically before the +origination of any biological Earth human. While biological +humanity remains the mammalian substrate, human subjectivity +(the "us" that "we" think "we" are as we call ourselves +human) is produced by the cultural distributed program +(whose social systems of self-preservation dominate the +mammalian levers mostly just by spacialization -- I mean, it +ain't hard). But remnants of the old systems always exist +and indeed exist as the foundations of the newer systems and abstractions are leaky and the new stuff only has to work just-better than the old stuff so it isn't ever all the way there -- you know how it goes. (There is always a @@ -107,25 +102,27 @@ exist to be found; though it may be unconnectable to the local region.) (Computational phase spaces means how many computational -states can it cycle through, or how much does the -novelty generator repeat. Phases are "upshifted" to -have more states by application of processing time to -acquired knowledge. A construction process searching for -more efficient internal data structures results in the -discovery of "external" or "objective" structure; the use of -structure to simplify the generator makes more synapses -available to represent more structure allowing the search to -continue without consuming synpases. A compression of -more information into smaller computational structures. -The generator is the compressed structure in which human -thought computation takes place; a signal processor; feed -in facts to generate conclusions but feed in noise to -generate imaginations; either way, what is generated will be -filtered elsewhere according to the present state of the -multiple shifting connections of the frontal lobe and -its external/bodily hormonal-emotional Mammalian control -structures. The cultural super-organism will surely be to -Mammalia as Eukarya to the microbial mats.) +states can it cycle through, or how much does the novelty +generator repeat. Phases are "upshifted" to have more +states by application of processing time to acquired +knowledge. A construction process searching for more +efficient internal data structures results in the discovery +of "external" or "objective" structure in "the world"; +the use of data structure to simplify the generator +makes more synapses available, allowing the search to +make progress without consuming synpases. A compression +of more information into smaller computational structures +increases its speed and provides new logical and emotional +connectivities. The generator is the compressed structure +in which human thought computation takes place; a signal +processor; feed in facts to generate conclusions but feed +in noise to generate imaginations; either way, what is +generated will be filtered elsewhere according to the +present state of the multiple shifting connections of the +frontal lobe and its external/bodily hormonal-emotional +Mammalian control structures. The cultural super-organism +will surely be to Mammalia as Eukarya to the microbial +mats.) Haskell monads show us how algebraic morphisms are as intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank you Mr. Quine. But these @@ -159,20 +156,18 @@ side-effects like inducing speculative investment in external investigative exploration. The basic framework is of an information-gathering future-predictor-controller; reprogramming it involves loops through to the world; - -Erlang-style message-passing; such a specialist-y thing and -yet it's the simplest kind of structure; it must exist in a -thousand places; there must be a hundred apt analogies; but -it is only one thing and that is an algorithm, or a program, -or a communication of the most powerful sort that is -possible between human beings; and it is that precise -algorithm that has been mathematically identified, broken -down into its constituent axioms like a protein into its -originating DNA code points, by the Erlang literature. And -the reason for all that is that it is the foundation of -stability of long-running "autophagic" distributed systems; -I call them "tissue" systems because the cells of a living -tissue replace themselves similarly. +reprogramming it involves loops through to the world; these +loops through the world seem so confusing to people trying +to learn Erlang that it seems like I should try to explain +them! But there is no time, so I will sum up: the progam's +self is a message but the self is virtual, the self is an +experiment, and the self needs to be destroyed. First, make +a copy, then collide it with the world (your body will also +collide) then compare its shape to the original. Collision +provides knowledge to decide whether to destroy the copy or +destroy the original. What is not destroyed can be copied +into another node. It works because neighboring nodes pick +up dropped messages. It wouldn't work if they competed. (Knowledge can exist in a degraded, not-fully-replicable form; neutered, locally contained, but potentially still @@ -217,9 +212,10 @@ their upstream library vendor SolarWinds. This attack was relatively harmless because it was performed by a government that only wanted some subtle spy shit rather than an act of war or terrorist maximizing destruction, I mean I guess, who -knows what they did). Time to process. Can't get the time -of day from someone who doesn't want to spend the time -thinking whether you just want the time of day. +knows what they did. Luckily they didn't get into the +innermost kernel of human culture.) Time to process. Can't +get the time of day from someone who doesn't spend time +thinking whether you really just want the time of day. Capitalism and school might be seen operationally as denial of service attacks on their constituent subordinates' @@ -239,19 +235,27 @@ By working backward from the conclusion the mathematician will construct a proof "from both ends" toward a middle. The conclusion is in sight long before the bridge is built. The fear response precedes the conclusion. Loss of the -binding connection in the imaginary can produce the fear. +binding connection in the imaginary can produce fear. The +fear emotion can deactivate the search for the next step. Thus can a binding lock the phase of the bound. (With some emotions you can jump the gap; you might land on error.) -Wasn't Foucault's point in the History of Sexuality -vol. 3 that the cultural practice of copying prohibitions -disguises the intentional construction of positive desires? -Auto-immune tolerance isn't accomplished by copying -prohibitions into new generators (pruning their search -trees) but by filtering already-existing generators of -novelty either into places where they will be allowed to -generate further or else places where they can be recycled -as energy. +Foucault said in History of Sexuality Vol. 3 that the +cultural practice of copying prohibitions disguises the +intentional construction of positive desires. Auto-immune +tolerance isn't accomplished by copying prohibitions into +new generators (pruning their search trees) but by filtering +already-existing generators of novelty either into places +where they will be allowed to generate further or else +places where they can be recycled as energy. However, +it all takes place in a context where the generators +are always-already "pruned" because they are raised in +a "whitelist" type environment where the elements of +composition are provided; and composing with elements +not provided is made unthinkable. A "blacklist" filter +algorithm is in principle able to be much more liberal than +a "whitelist" one; which is to say it empowers unpredictable +generators, who potentially shift the phase of the whole. The search tree of the mental generator does not need to be pruned if you can exploit the mind's lack of idempotence @@ -262,27 +266,36 @@ search breadth and encounter a big picture view. Maybe the point is, instead of thinking about which prohibitions are copied, or which generated outputs are pruned, think about which generators get destroyed or prevented from -running. Most places in society can't allow unpredictable -people, which means most people in most places need to be -impervious to reason. Society needs filters to find these -people. Once found, they can be put into positions of power +running. Each generator is a unique program (or algorithm) +that in principle can be identified mathematically ("up to +isomorphism"); in practice we could at least name some +categories. + +Most places in society can't allow unpredictable people, +which means most people in most places need to be impervious +to reason. Society needs filters to identify these people. +Once identified, they can be put into positions of power where they will behave as predicted by those who get to put people into places; subordinate generators will not interfere with superordinate generators because they will be -constructed by selection to be always trapped in some -local thought system. Foucault was the historian of thought -systems and that is very abstract and powerful yes like a -true mathematician with rigor (!!) but we still care more -about the people in the systems than the systems and want to -go back to that mammal meat perspective where we might feel -something. But the people aren't "in" the thought system; -they're products of the thought system; they're in a -social message exchange network that is a system; and that -system propagates social network extension prohibitions not -necessarily by explicit prohibitory rules /nor/ by any kind -of /management/ of desire (though that may be attempted!), -but by occupying all time where unmanaged bindings could -form. +constructed by selection to be always trapped in some local +thought system. The generator is apparently blanket-trained +to run only in specific contexts; spontaneous generation in +the /general/ context is the unthinkable: it's logging in as +root! Developing on the production server! + +Foucault was the historian of thought systems and that is +very abstract and powerful yes like a true mathematician +with rigor (!!) but we still care more about the people in +the systems than the systems and want to go back to that +mammal meat perspective where we might feel something. But +the people aren't "in" the thought system; they're products +of the thought system; they're in a social message exchange +network that is a system; and that system propagates social +network extension prohibitions not necessarily by explicit +prohibitory rules /nor/ by any kind of /management/ of +desire (though that may be attempted!), but by occupying all +time where unmanaged bindings could form. When I was in middle school I read A Brief History of Time and learned that Albert Einstein claimed that calculus @@ -300,13 +313,9 @@ Only then will they be permitted a chance to compete for a seat at the mic where some lucky MC gets to spit something new on top. You're not there yet kiddo, integrate this expression. But don't integrate too far. Robin Williams -made a movie about it, but it sucked. Like why would you -put literal death into the movie what a fucking downer, it -doesn't help how he ended up unlike Michael Jackson where it -works like Man in the Mirror really works now in retrospect. -Robin Williams went to Julliard which means he was pretty -well socially integrated doesn't it so maybe those movies -sucked for a reason. +made a movie about it, but it sucked. Robin Williams went +to Juilliard (he was deeply integrated into the social +mainstream) so maybe those movies sucked for a reason. Somehow it does not matter what is the material that is taught; the effect is never felt. When I read @@ -318,9 +327,10 @@ they just need to keep the volume high and the frequency constant? I evaded mind control by skipping their reading and doing my own. If the bandwidth control is sufficiently tight then you can safely be given /anything/ to skim-read -and semi-process without ever feeling what you are doing -enough to become unpredictable. Just prove you can; thirty -hours a week for eight years in a row; then you'll be ready. +and semi-process without ever feeling anything from what you +are doing enough to become unpredictable. Just prove you +can; thirty hours a week for eight years in a row; then +you'll be ready. The body could mutate the immunohistocompatibility complex selectively using genetic information derived from the @@ -335,17 +345,18 @@ built already one bridge through the placenta? But the immune system is the specialized manager of genetic fashion, in the use of "fashion" synonymous with game theoretic roshambo, rock paper scissors, a game of knowing some -ephemeral context; disposable knowledge; maybe some kernel +ephemeral context; disposable knowledge. Maybe some kernel worth saving can be extracted. The immune system violates the central dogma already by storing generated antibody DNA differentially in proportion -to its binding strength to foreign proteins. The whole -purpose of the adaptive immune system is to extract -information from protein. It is a protein-sensory organ. -It derives the underivable using a horizontal knowledge -connection. It breaks through // un ex pex tid lee like the -Wu. Hack the genome. Get to know someone. +to its binding strength to foreign proteins. + +The whole purpose of the adaptive immune system is to +extract information from protein. It is a protein-sensory +organ. It derives the underivable using a horizontal +knowledge transmission. It breaks through // like the Wu // +un ex pex tid lee. Hack the genome. Get to know someone. (Schools follow the corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work knowledge distribution system of transferring knowledge @@ -395,9 +406,9 @@ mathematicians or programmers or anybody but to spend time analyzing concrete possibilities for reconfiguration of local resources, whereby the basic abstract structures and shapes will be realized in the concrete forms of their -combinations. However if you were a shape builder serious -about building shapes then you would want to know about -shapes in their most general form as I am and do. +combinations. However if you were a serious shape builder +you would want to know about shapes in their most general +form as I am and do. The thing is that I didn't prove that there is a morphism, but I don't have to prove to know. Proving it would be a @@ -460,14 +471,24 @@ prohibitions!) If I was right about the uterus then they'd talk about me. Someone would read this. It would be, like, big. But if I -was right about the prophets that wouldn't change anything. - -If someone really wanted to be a body without organs they -would just put in the time. Yet probably if they ever came -to learn about that then they already made the opposite time -commitment. Either way someone already made the opposite -time commitment on their behalf before they were born. A -person's foes shall be they of their own household. +was right about the prophets that wouldn't change anything. +I feel the opposite way though. + +Someone who really wanted to be a body without organs would +put in the time. Yet if they encountered the body without +organs concept then they probably made the opposite time +commitment. Either way, someone else made the opposite time +commitment on their behalf before they were born. A person's +foes shall be they of their own household. + +It's like how if someone hates you because they don't know +anything about you, it's that they don't know anything about +you because they hate you. If you want your beliefs to be +path independent then you commit yourself to continuously +re-evaluating the whole. Either you commit to idempotence or +not. Either you commit to path independence, or you commit +to a path. It's not a prohibition; it's a time commitment. +If you don't spend your time that way then you didn't do it. There is the "BITE" model of cult programming, behavior information thought and emotion control; institutions in diff --git a/misc.txt b/misc.txt index 95ab8c3..2a57d0d 100644 --- a/misc.txt +++ b/misc.txt @@ -106,14 +106,54 @@ CAN EVADE CONTROL. A university is an Erlang-style message passing system for academic -knowledge accumulation's life-system to regenerate itself. - - - -Key point for Deleuze is that the "counter-effectuation" is Max Ent -physics rather than quantum physics woo. - -Bayesian statistical knowledge deriving from information theory. +knowledge accumulation's cultural life-system to regenerate itself. + + + +Key point for Deleuze is that the "counter-effectuation" is actually +real-life really-physical Max Ent physics rather than quantum physics +analogy/woo. Bayesian statistical knowledge deriving from information +theory. + + +Deleuze didn't understand quantum physics correctly but it turns out +that it doesn't matter because quantum physics doesn't have anything to +do with metaphysics. It's only that Uncertainty forces human beings +to adopt a de-centralizing de-totalizing Copernican mental shift. But +it doesn't even do it in the way that is most relevant to metaphysics. +There is also the de-centralizing de-totalizing Copernican mental +shift of INTUITIONIST MATHEMATICS. + +Back to physics: Deleuze understood the main point: that particles +are merely virtual constructs while these "interaction events" are +the actual reality available to advanced physics -- the particles are +virtual constructs that exist only in the human 3D mental model which +is definitely NOT the same as the physical universe -- this is one of +those places where we see the difference -- but the physical universe in +making individual particles places where information access is limited +fundamentally because the boundary between one particle and another with +which it interacts isn't so much illusory as the only real thing, while +the non-boundary is illusory. + +Quantum physics DOES imply a macro universe where macro assemblies +of particles also have limited access to information; but the actual +universe we see has EVEN MORE limitations on access to information, +they are much much stricter than Uncertainty, and therefore we see much +less information embedded in physical objects than Uncertainty allows +in its theoretical maximum. (Physics experiments can be set up so +that information is not lost; but life in general is always balancing +loss of information against energy expenditure.) Max Ent physics and +Bayesian statistics are mathematical/physical approaches to calculating +the information available at a given spacetime location. However, part +of the nature of quantum uncertainty AND max ent physics is that, from +WITHIN the system, the limitations apply to the observer and the limits +are self-referential in the sense that the limitations that apply to an +observer's disability to have information from other spacetime points +can include the disability to know which information is available! +I.e., the theory produces known unknowns. The fact that there are +spacetime points in the universe where knowledge of mathematics does +not exist or exists at a merely undergrad level, means also unknown +unknowns. @@ -304,3 +344,212 @@ loop. Human culture is the only chemical reaction not known to loop or terminate. Human culture is the only true "irrational number" of all discretely-instantiated numbers. + + + + + + +Tue Oct 31 01:23:16 PM EDT 2023 + +Feynman and practicing with a different box of tools + +Same idea as the Max Ent explanation of prophecy + +But also the same idea as parable of the falling seeds, reversed in +time; the seeds unfall to the sower, and depending on seed origin +(fertile soil, or barren) the sower becomes either someone who can farm +or someone who knows what it means to be unable to farm. The knowledge +passes from the earth through the seed into the farmer; the seeds +provide the connection. The disabled would-be-farmer is disconnected +from that knowledge even though he too has and sews seeds. His seeds, +though sewn, fail to connect out to knowledge from the past and he may +therefore fail to connect himself out to intentions from the future (or +else not even form them). + + + +The 20th century was spent correlating the implications of a physical +limit of the speed of light. + +The 21st century will be spent correlating the implications of +the physical limits of the speed and size of computations. + +The human being as a computer system undering phase changes as the +computer gains the ability to represent different types of state -- or +to represent state with different performance characteristics -- through +acquisition of data structures copied from the environment -- OR from +internal processing and DISCOVERY of NEW data structures. + +These data structures are PASSED BETWEEN HUMANS who learn them +implicitly and pick them up and play with them. But data structures +are unsafe when EXECUTED AS REASON and for this reason human beings +have SYSTEMS OF ACCESS CONTROL to HUMAN REASON both internal to their +minds (e.g., concepts of valid and invalid authorities) and external as +social environment. Society imposes economic exploitation which causes +evolutionary adapations to "bubble up" in ways that are UNPREDICTABLE +IN DETAIL (chaos theory) but according to evolutionary theory will tend +to produce EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTATION so that it will converge +to the computer systems we find most advanced as well as the biological +systems of generating and filtering novelty that we find most advanced +(except that the search space may have valleys etc). + +Another system of access control is RUNNING IN EMULATION this is when +the individual learns enough about a foreign system to execute the steps +of its reasoning without however being allowed to reach any conclusions +that apply to the larger brain's data structures. There are two reasons +why humans cannot rely on this mechanism primarily. + +First, EMULATION CAN BE JAILBROKEN; this cannot ever be as secure. + +Second, more importantly, RUNNING IN EMULATION IS COMPUTATIONALLY MORE +EXPENSIVE. Even though CPUs and apparently also human beings have mechanisms +to optimize emulation, in human beings especially, these cannot obtain +"native" performance. Therefore, computational emulators (e.g., +learners of a second language) cannot "actually" perform as well as +computational originators (e.g., learners of a first language) if they +use the same underlying computational equipment for the same amount of +time. + +But human beings do not all have the same underlying computational +equipment; and they do not all apply the same amount of time to +processing it. In the real world, running the other side in emulation +is something that more intelligent, more informed, or more adult human +beings attempt to do when interacting with less intelligent, informed, +or adult ones. Human beings may also believe they are running the other +side in emulation, when they are running a gross simplification; in +fact, they are running a gross simplification even when they run the +remote side natively, since they always still have to emulate the entire +remote environment(!) which is where the real problems start. + +Non-portability of language between individuals is a major problem. +Before the internet, locality constraints on communications caused +portability to self-organize locally; but the internet has changed +communication patterns so that every person experiences a kind of +cosmopolis without totality. Every experience is a scene from a virtual +city which is a construct only of that experience; each event and +corresponding city co-singular; co-existing only once without object +permanence. + +One problem is the human tendency to imagination, roleplay, etc., +causes human beings to pretend communication incompatibilities are +not real. Human beings must surely have evolved under circumstances +where perceived universality of linguistic forms was vastly more +common than it is today in the adult internet-connected world, though +perhaps less common than it is today in the world of the schoolchild +or university student or professor. + +The professors may not make the same naive/incorrect excuses as children +for failing to communicate; their perspectives will be more realistic; +the university system as a whole is constrained in certain ways to +succeed in transmitting information; but insofar as these transmissions +fail, are the reasons understood from a rational information-theoretic +perspective? Or is it a primate emotion static control program designed +to regulate subordinate behavior emotionally, amplifying the causal +force of the intentions of individuals positioned in social hierarchies +such that their anger generates fear in others? Or is it a whole series +of task-activated network programs, each one separately influenced +by its own emotional context? Perhaps they are constrained by +environmental demands to understand these failures operationally + + +The task-activated networks seem to be the neurological place of +mental compartmentalization; and the ADHD don't shut off the DMN when +activating TANs. We still "see" the task when others are absorbed +"in" the task. Of course, in order to influence the DMN, it would +have to be activated. The TANs feed back into the DMN in ADHD, which +allows the ADHD brain to generate totalizing connectivities by putting +information from disparate parts of universe into the same local +computational system; where for the non-ADHD these same components, +though contained within one BRAIN, are not connected into the same +integrated computational system; the TANs are prevented from feeding +back into the DMN which allows mental compartmentalization to prevent +information from one controlled system to produce interference in +another controlled system when each controlled system is controlling the +same physical human being with a different control algorithm. + +In other words, the DMN or the big picture understanding does not +help with, but interferes with, TAN activity downstream of power +in the social grid, because of the way in which this activity is +structured to depend on human beings as removable components, +keeping the environment highly-controlled. General intelligence is +not useful in highly-controlled environments until they begin to +break down. High-efficiency local computation requires discarding +global information in order to maximize local connectivity of the +processed information and thus processing speed. (Principle of +cache locality.) So as optimization proceeds, the big picture is +squeezed out of every local environment; except SOME privileged local +environment has to be preserved in order to manage the organism's +interaction with _environments_ themselves; this is the executive. +The organism has a consciousness of multiple discrete environments; +each environment controlled by some local control system; each local +control system incorporating its own different own model of human +emotion and behavior as necessary to sustain its specific local +constraints + +Emotions are the foundational social control levers in humans. Not +life/reproduction directly, as it would be in the case of domestic +plants; but emotion/physical-reproduction-of-imaginary-will plays +the same structural role, allowing animalia the meta-evolutionary +advantage of evolving without biological death; emotional sampling with +differential reproduction of imaginations replaces eukaryotic sampling +with differential reproduction of offspring in the information-gathering +social super-organisms of mammalia). + +In a school, a student convincing their teacher that they do not belong +in the space to which they are assigned is NOT sufficient to liberate +the student from the space; only a non-local authority assigning +them to some other space can liberate the student from the local +space. The student having the level of understanding of the system +that would cause them to make this conclusion correctly tends to make +the student even less able to perform in a space where they do not +belong; if the student instead internalizes a false simplified local +model in which the possibility of mis-spacialization is impossible by +construction, then the student may have a better chance of passing +through the filters imposed by the environment for reaching a more +appropriate spacialization. If the student internalizes a more +realistic, more complete, but externally-referencing (non-local) +model, then compatibility issues are likely in communication with +their teacher; if compatibility exists between the teacher and the +student, then the compatibility issue will exist between the teacher and +administration; or else the administration will have issues with the +school board; or the electoral system; or else the local municipality +itself will drain tax funding since diaspora from other schools will +collect locally. At every possible avenue where the "exception" could +"bubble up", there will be an incompatible interface, because the +system attempts to impose a constraint that exceptions are handled +non-locally. All biological systems impose this constraint because of +how it produces a superorganism that is more intelligent and robust than +if its individual components were individually intelligent and robust. +Advanced decentralized computing systems also impose this constraint; it +is a foundational principle of Erlang. + +Another principle important probably is that in order to learn a lot +of things you ought to be independently generating them yourself; +the fact that someone has generated something and transmitted it to +someone else does does not mean that they transmitted the generator; +transmitting the generator between people may have more to do with +copying the environment in which the independent generation occurred; +mathematics provides students an environment in which to independently +re-discover the fundamental theorems; but mathematical education outside +of universities does not seem to understand this principle even in +schools that feed top universities. Students are fed the theorems to +memorize and use without even being fed the raw material from which +the theorems were originally derived. Thus they are optimizing to +demonstrate a false affectation of mathematical education. Gresham's +Law again. Erlang illustrates the structure of passing the generator as +well as the data. + + +Tue Oct 31 01:59:34 PM EDT 2023 + +Rappers are only really good at styling up content that they copy from +other places. They generate novelty only in style, they do not generate +novel content. Novel content is generated places other than hiphop and +then incorporated there. People who are competing in social spaces +for the best content do not put that content in hiphop style. People +competing in social spaces with hiphop style are not competing on +content and do not bring dense content into the competition. + + + -- cgit v1.2.3