human-communication.txt

1 files changed, 60 insertions, 27 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index fae5f05..c43b89f 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Human Communication
 
-OR
+  or
 
-Follow the logic of the knowledge.
+Follow the logic of the knowledge
 
 
 Human beings  can transmit to one  another two fundamentally
@@ -52,6 +52,22 @@ mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance). The word kernel  is to
 be  interpreted as  in  the  algebraic structure:  preserved
 across a morphism.
 
+(Computational  phase spaces  means  how many  computational
+states  can  it   cycle  through,  or  how   much  does  the
+novelty-generator  repeat.  Phases  are "upshifted"  to have
+more states  by application  of processing time  to acquired
+knowledge.   A  construction   process  searching  for  more
+efficient structures results in  the discovery of structure;
+the use  of structure to  simplify the generator  makes more
+synapses  available  to  represent more  structure  allowing
+the  search  to  continue  without  consuming  synpases.   A
+compression of  more information into  smaller computational
+structures.  The  generator is  the compressed  structure in
+which  human thought  computation  takes place;  computation
+"behind" compressed  data is  one of  those crazy  math type
+projects most professional programmers  aren't close to, but
+their programs do not generate novelty.)
+
 In  a  literal  kernel,  the  DNA  information  sequence  in
 the  seed's nucleus  is a  literal algebraic  kernel, in  an
 algebra  of sexual  reproduction that  includes a  mechanism
@@ -65,7 +81,7 @@ emotions   applied   distributed  computation   to   sensory
 information  turning  e.g.  individualized sight  into  area
 surveillance (Eukaryotic sexual  sampling came into conflict
 with high  parental investment  involved in  non-genetic but
-still vertical transfer of acquired environmental knowledge,
+still-vertical transfer of acquired environmental knowledge,
 a  sort  of Lamarckian  epigenetic  thing  if you  are  into
 analogies  YUCK); that  super-organism was  again jettisoned
 when Humanity transitioned into its cultural message-passing
@@ -105,16 +121,32 @@ resonance;  the frontal  lobe  can detect  fear of  thought;
 mental  flight  from  fear  will prevent  the  process  from
 computing to completion.
 
+These  reconfigurations can  trampoline  into callouts  with
+side-effects like inducing investment in investigations. The
+basic    framework    is   of    an    information-gathering
+future-predictor-controller; reprogramming it involves loops
+through to the world; these  loops through the world seem so
+confusing to  people trying  to learn  Erlang that  it seems
+like I should try to explain them!  But there is no time, so
+I will  sum up: the  program's self  is the message  but the
+self is  virtual, the  self is an  experiment, and  the self
+needs to be destroyed.  First,  make a copy, then collide it
+with the  world (your body  will also collide)  then compare
+its shape to the original.  Collision provides the knowledge
+necessary  to decide  whether  to destroy  the  copy or  the
+original.  What is not destroyed  can be copied into another
+node.
+
 (Knowledge  can exist  in  a degraded,  not-fully-replicable
 form;  neutered, locally  contained,  but potentially  still
 fully-activated   locally.   Such   knowledge  or   internal
-programming  may  be  unavailable for  mental  debugging  as
-if  its  source  code were  unavailable. When  knowledge  is
-filtered out  by the  executive function,  it may  appear to
-have  this  neutered  locally-activated  form,  or  else  be
-deactivated. Resolving the emotional response could activate
+programming may  be unavailable  for mental debugging  as if
+its source code were unavailable. When knowledge is filtered
+out  by  connection  to  fear  in  the  executive  function,
+it  may  appear  to  have  this  neutered  locally-activated
+form. Resolving  the   emotional  response   could  activate
 neutered  knowledge and/or  cause first-time  replication of
-knowledge previously  unreplicated. The initiated processing
+knowledge previously  unreplicable. The initiated processing
 requires  an  unpredictable  amount  of  computing  time  to
 complete.)
 
@@ -126,10 +158,10 @@ to  "execute" knowledge  in  most  contexts. To execute  the
 knowledge  means  to  incorporate it  potentially  into  the
 brain's every mental structure according to its own internal
 logic. The internal logic of  the knowledge!! not the brain.
-Of course, to incorporate  more knowledge requires more TIME
-than  incorporating less  knowledge; something  that affects
-the brain's  every mental  structure may  take as  much time
-to  learn  as  a  second  language.   And  that  illustrates
+Of  course,  to  incorporate more  knowledge  requires  more
+TIME  than  incorporating  less  knowledge;  something  that
+affects  the  brain's every  mental  structure  may take  as
+much  time to  learn as  a language.   And that  illustrates
 the  key  reason why  these  systems  are unavailable:  they
 do  not make  available  sufficient time  to process.   Time
 is  even the  MOTIVATION  for restricting  access in  modern
@@ -166,25 +198,26 @@ will construct  a proof  "from both  ends" toward  a middle.
 The conclusion is in sight  before the bridge is built.  The
 fear response precedes the  conclusion.  Loss of the binding
 connection can  produce the fear.   Thus can a  binding lock
-the phases of the bound.
+the phases  of the bound.   With some emotions you  can jump
+the gap then you might land on error.
 
 When I was 13  years old I read A Brief  History of Time and
 learned that  Albert Einstein  claimed that  calculus proves
 Parmenides right:  time is an  illusion.  Two years  later I
 dropped out of  high school and took  calculus at University
-of  Connecticut  to find  out  for  myself.   No one  in  my
-calculus or  analysis classes ever talked  about Parmenides.
-Why not?  Maybe because Einstein  may be right: calculus may
-be  able to  prove something.   Then the  students could  be
-changed, set against their parents like by Jesus' sword.  In
-fact these  students are meant  to change and to  change the
-world -- later.  First they  must pass through the Thymus of
-society proving they have  inscribed its inherited knowledge
-into their shape.  Only then will they be permitted a chance
-to compete for a seat at the mic where some lucky MC gets to
-spit  something new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo,
-integrate  this expression.   But don't  integrate too  far.
-Robin Williams made a movie about that, but it sucked.
+of Connecticut.  No  one in my calculus  or analysis classes
+ever  talked  about  Parmenides.  Why  not?   Maybe  because
+Einstein  may  be  right:  calculus may  be  able  to  prove
+something.  Then the students  could be changed, set against
+their parents like by Jesus'  sword.  In fact these students
+are meant to change and to change the world -- later.  First
+they must  pass through the  Thymus of society  proving they
+have  inscribed its  inherited knowledge  into their  shape.
+Only then will  they be permitted a chance to  compete for a
+seat at the  mic where some lucky MC gets  to spit something
+new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo, integrate  this
+expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
+made a movie about that, but it sucked.
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge