human-communication.txt

1 files changed, 73 insertions, 49 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index 5a694ab..e1eb7e3 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ immunohistocompatibility complex (an  FC receptor); called a
 transporter, it functions like  a passport -- an unforgeable
 signature  that  must  be   presented  to  pass  the  filter
 mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance). The word kernel  is to
-be  interpreted as  in  the  algebraic structure:  preserved
-across a morphism.
+be interpreted as in the algebraic structure: a generator is
+preserved across a morphism.
 
 In  a  literal  kernel,  the  DNA  information  sequence  in
 the  seed's  nucleus  is  a  literal  algebraic  kernel,  in
@@ -238,25 +238,32 @@ Einstein  may  be  right:  calculus may  be  able  to  prove
 something.  Then the students  could be changed, set against
 their parents like by Jesus'  sword.  In fact these students
 are meant to change and to change the world -- later.  First
-they  must  pass  through  the  Thymus  of  society  proving
-they  have  inscribed  its inherited  knowledge  into  their
-shape.  Only then will they be permitted a chance to compete
-for  a seat  at the  mic where  some lucky  MC gets  to spit
-something new on top.  You're not there yet kiddo, integrate
-this  expression.   But  don't  integrate  too  far.   Robin
-Williams made a movie about  that, but it sucked. Somehow it
-does not matter what the material that is taught, the effect
-is never  felt; when I  read Nineteen Eighty-Four  I already
-had prisoner consciousness, but no one could tell, before or
-after; in  secret I wrote  many more essays than  they asked
-for; maybe they could tell, and really they forced me out.
+they must  pass through the  Thymus of society  proving they
+have  inscribed its  inherited knowledge  into their  shape.
+Only then will  they be permitted a chance to  compete for a
+seat at the  mic where some lucky MC gets  to spit something
+new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo, integrate  this
+expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
+made a movie about it, but it sucked.
+
+Somehow it does not matter what the material that is taught,
+the effect is never felt. When I read Nineteen Eighty-Four I
+already had  prisoner consciousness, but no  one could tell,
+before or  after. In secret, I  wrote many more  essays than
+they  asked for. (Maybe  they  could tell,  and really  they
+forced me out.) Don't they just need to keep the volume high
+and the frequency constant? You can safely be given anything
+to skim-read semi-process without  ever feeling what you are
+doing  enough  to be  unpredictable.   Just  prove you  can;
+thirty hours a week for eight years in a row; then you'll be
+ready.  The medium is the message.
 
 The body  could mutate the  immunohistocompatibility complex
 selectively  using  genetic  information  derived  from  the
 testing   of   antibodies   against   the   environment   of
 pathogens,  recovering  information from  pathogen  proteins
 by   differentially-sampling  antibody   DNA;  and   thereby
-violate  the  central dogma;  maybe  in  the embryo  in  the
+violate  the "central  dogma"; maybe  in the  embryo in  the
 creation  of eggs;  because of  the transporters  that bring
 antibodies there.  Would nature  throw away this magnificent
 construction  of   externally-validated  knowledge?   Having
@@ -265,21 +272,19 @@ immune system is the specialized manager of genetic fashion,
 in  the  use of  "fashion"  synonymous  with game  theoretic
 roshambo, rock paper scissors, a game of knowing the context
 ahead of time somehow, of being more connected to the future
-ultimately;  less so  than  to the  past. How  to find  that
-kernel? Well  doesn't it  have these  dual binding  thingies
-with the inverse thing there?  So  it can take those off the
-filtered  T cells  and match  the proteins  of the  variable
-region  to some  embedded immunohistocompatibility  variable
-region  by   expressing  all   the  immunohistocompatibility
-alleles and test-binding to that  inverse side just like the
-Thymus. It's a much smaller set  though right, it's just the
-initial generators of the variable region; like 30~300 genes
-instead of 3,000~30,000. So it doesn't  have to be nearly as
-big an organ as the Thymus.
+ultimately;  less so  than to  the past;  the recent  may be
+forgotten  for  a  reason;  maybe some  kernel  to  save  be
+extracted.   Being that  connected to  the future  means not
+just knowing but changing the future; is it the only way?
 
 The  immune system  violates  the central  dogma already  by
 storing generated antibody  DNA differentially in proportion
-to its binding strength to foreign proteins.
+to  its binding  strength  to foreign  proteins.  The  whole
+purpose  of  the  adaptive   immune  system  is  to  extract
+information from  protein.  It  is a protein  sensory organ.
+It  derives the  underivable  using  a horizontal  knowledge
+connection.  It breaks through // un ex pex tid lee like the
+Wu.  Hack the genome.
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge
@@ -298,17 +303,19 @@ local activity; you are educated stupid in your timecubicle!
 and by the  way it doesn't help  the non-local superordinate
 if  the local  superordinate has  global knowledge. Handling
 local  exceptions non-locally  is  good distributed  systems
-design;  keeping the  local  system simpler  by only  making
-it  complex   enough  to   handle  the   most  unexceptional
-pathway; conflicting are  a disciplinary control structure's
-enforcement  of  normality vs.  the  ability  to detect  the
-exceptional;  behavioral  control prevents  measurement;  in
-general control prevents measurement; control cannot measure
-what  it also  determines. Trying  to  control people  never
-works for me even when  it does. Upshift the phase of anyone
-and they pop right out of these horrible timecrystals like a
-neutrino, as in  nobody notices, don't trust  me because you
-don't want to know.)
+design; keeping the  local system simpler by  only making it
+complex  enough to  handle the  most unexceptional  pathway;
+these  people are  constructed by  the system  itself to  be
+barely complex enough to handle the normal case; conflicting
+are  a  disciplinary   control  structure's  enforcement  of
+normality  vs.  the  ability   to  detect  the  exceptional;
+behavioral control prevents  measurement; in general control
+prevents measurement;  control cannot  measure what  it also
+determines. Trying to control people never works for me even
+when it does. Upshift the phase of anyone and they pop right
+out of these  horrible crystal lattices like  a neutrino; as
+in nobody notices; don't trust  me because you don't want to
+know.)
 
 The frontal lobe  is the site of the  executive function; it
 is there that  memories of knowledge and  emotions past come
@@ -322,15 +329,33 @@ memory and its alternative emotional consequences.
 
 The thing is  that I didn't prove that there  is a morphism,
 but I  don't have to prove  to know.  Proving it  would be a
-matter of writing the program, and somehow I know when I can
-write the program  before writing it.  But of  course I have
-been wrong before;  that is why my next rhyme  style will be
-the code poem. It is funny that it is easier to prove things
-to computers  than to  humans; it was  easier for  humans to
-build something  to understand  them than to  be understood!
-but not  really because  building computers took  50 million
-years of accumulated culture. Isn't  it only the accumulated
-culture itself that the computers understand?
+matter of writing  the program, and somehow!! I  know when I
+can write  the program  before writing  it.  Don't  you too?
+But of course I have been  wrong before; that is why my next
+rhyme style  will be the code  poem. It is funny that  it is
+easier to prove  things to computers than to  humans; it was
+easier for humans to build something to understand them than
+to be understood! but  not really because building computers
+took  50  million  years of  accumulated  culture. Isn't  it
+only  the  accumulated  culture itself  that  the  computers
+understand?
+
+A  narrative  or  linear  structure  implies  some  kind  of
+intentional  emotional manipulation  performed on  a mammal,
+while  a proof  structured according  to its  own logic  can
+specify the  logical and  informational dependencies  of its
+conclusion in any order.  Way to make sure no one reads it.
+
+A proof is a program which means it not merely a conclusion,
+but  a   new  capability;  the  capability   to  generate  a
+new  class  of  conclusions.   That is:  the  capability  to
+generate spontaneous behaviors.
+
+It is  exactly the thing institutions  must exterminate like
+an infection, internally.   Their face to the  public is the
+individuals selected  for their  highest immunity to  it.  I
+got your back  but you best to watch your  front // coz it's
+the jivas who front // whose pullin stunts.
 
 There  is the  "BITE"  model of  cult programming,  behavior
 information  thought and  emotion  control; institutions  in
@@ -347,8 +372,7 @@ in order to  retain its binding function  reliably; in other
 words once you give in and drop the hours down to 20 you end
 up with MORE retention problems!
 
-  FOR YOUR FIRST
-  EMPLOYER
+  FOR YOUR FIRST EMPLOYER
   A COLLEGE DEGREE
   IS THE ONLY
   DOWRY