human-communication.txt

1 files changed, 116 insertions, 57 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index d3aced3..4a733a7 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 Human Communication
   or
 Follow the logic of the knowledge
+  or
+Here are some of my notes for the poems
 
 
 Human beings  can transmit to one  another two fundamentally
@@ -43,13 +45,13 @@ before DNA was  discovered; so also before  discovery of the
 structure  of controlled  mutation  in life's  environmental
 sampling  mechanism; so  again instead  is the  artificially
 bred/genetically  engineered  DNA  of  the  immune  system's
-antibody-generating   cells. These   have  mechanisms   that
-control the production of novelty, localizing it to one part
-of the  DNA strand, while circumscribing  every novelty with
-proof  of  provenance used  to  protect  the system  against
-foreign novelty  (a single  recognizable DNA strand  that is
-the same for every antibody;  that is, its coded protein has
-a  strong chemical  binding  to a  matching  protein in  the
+antibody-generating cells. These have mechanisms that induce
+the production of novelty, localizing  it to one part of the
+DNA strand, while circumscribing every novelty with proof of
+provenance  used  to  protect  the  system  against  foreign
+novelty (a single  recognizable DNA strand that  is the same
+for  every  antibody;  that  is, its  coded  protein  has  a
+strong  chemical  binding  to  a  matching  protein  in  the
 immunohistocompatibility complex (an  FC receptor); called a
 transporter, it functions like  a passport -- an unforgeable
 signature  that  must  be   presented  to  pass  the  filter
@@ -63,23 +65,23 @@ an   algebra  of   sexual  reproduction   that  includes   a
 mechanism  amplifying  reproductive   success  of  males  in
 Eukaryotes  providing an  information-accumulation advantage
 by  more reliably  capturing  novelty on  the Y  chromosome,
-progressively jettisoned  along the Mammalia  lineage toward
-a  super-organism  phase  which   gave  the  next  level  of
-meta-advantage in  information accumulation  as group-shared
-emotions   applied   distributed  computation   to   sensory
-information  turning  e.g.  individualized sight  into  area
-surveillance in the simpler mammals but only message-passing
-of   programs  in   advanced  primates   (Eukaryotic  sexual
-sampling came  into conflict  with high  parental investment
-involved in  non-genetic but still-vertical  transmission of
-acquired  environmental  knowledge/connectivity, a  sort  of
-Lamarckian  epigenetic  thing  if  you  are  into  analogies
-YUCK);  that   super-organism  was  again   jettisoned  when
-Humanity  transitioned  into  its  cultural  message-passing
-super-organism phase  where all  Earth life must  survive in
-symbiotic  exchange with  or  as constituent  elements of  a
-single social machine originating chronologically before the
-origination of any biological  Earth human (in fact Humanity
+progressively jettisoned as  the Mammalia lineage contructed
+a super-organism which gave the next level of meta-advantage
+in information accumulation as group-shared emotions applied
+distributed computation to  sensory information turning e.g.
+individualized sight  into area surveillance in  the simpler
+mammals; but  only message-passing  of programs  in advanced
+primates.   (Eukaryotic sexual  sampling came  into conflict
+with  high  parental   investment  involved  in  non-genetic
+but  still-vertical transmission  of acquired  environmental
+knowledge/connectivity,  a  sort  of  Lamarckian  epigenetic
+thing if  you are into analogies  YUCK.) That super-organism
+in  turn progressively  jettisoned  as Humanity  transitions
+into  its  cultural   message-passing  super-organism  phase
+where  all Earth  life  must survive  in symbiotic  exchange
+with, or  as constituent  elements of, Earth's  unique human
+biosocial ecomachine originating  chronologically before the
+origination of any biological Earth human. (In fact Humanity
 remains the mammalian substrate  but human subjectivity (the
 "us"  that "we"  think "we"  are even  as we  call ourselves
 human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose
@@ -114,12 +116,13 @@ filtered  elsewhere according  to the  present state  of the
 multiple  shifting  connections  of  the  frontal  lobe  and
 its  external/bodily  hormonal-emotional  Mammalian  control
 structures. The  cultural super-organism  will surely  be to
-Mammalia as Eukarya were to the microbial mats.)
+Mammalia as Eukarya to the microbial mats.)
 
 Haskell  monads  show  us  how algebraic  morphisms  are  as
 intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank  you Mr. Quine. But these
 are all  just simple recursions. They are  just the simplest
-structures that exist. And yet  how much more complicated to
+structures that exist.  Monoids  are just sequences.  Monads
+are  just  nesting. And yet  how  much  more complicated  to
 understand them than the far  more complex 2+2=4, which even
 people who are not simple believe to be more simple!  People
 who  think 2+2=4  is simple  may be  remembering the  answer
@@ -154,9 +157,9 @@ self is the message but the  self is virtual, the self is an
 experiment, and the self needs to be destroyed.  First, make
 a copy, then collide it with  the world (your body will also
 collide) then compare its  shape to the original.  Collision
-provides  the  knowledge  necessary  to  decide  whether  to
-destroy the copy or the original.  What is not destroyed can
-be  copied into  another node.
+provides knowledge to decide whether  to destroy the copy or
+destroy the original.   What is not destroyed  can be copied
+into another node.
 
 (Knowledge  can exist  in  a degraded,  not-fully-replicable
 form;  neutered, locally  contained,  but potentially  still
@@ -227,13 +230,40 @@ binding connection  in the  imaginary can produce  the fear.
 Thus can a binding lock the  phase of the bound.  (With some
 emotions you can jump the gap; you might land on error.)
 
+Wasn't  Foucault's   point  in  the  History   of  Sexuality
+vol. 3 that  the cultural  practice of  copying prohibitions
+disguises the intentional  construction of positive desires?
+Auto-immune   tolerance   isn't  accomplished   by   copying
+prohibitions  into  new  generators  (pruning  their  search
+trees)  but  by  filtering  already-existing  generators  of
+novelty either  into places  where they  will be  allowed to
+generate further or  else places where they  can be recycled
+as energy.
+
+The search tree of the mental  generator does not need to be
+pruned if  you can  exploit the  mind's lack  of idempotence
+(i.e. its path dependence,  its hysteresis) and merely order
+the  inputs so  that the  search  is directed  into a  local
+maximum  where  it cannot  easily  backtrack  out to  obtain
+search breadth and encounter a  big picture view.  Maybe the
+point is,  instead of thinking about  which prohibitions are
+copied, or  which generated outputs are  pruned, think about
+which generators  get destroyed  or prevented  from running.
+Most  places in  society can't  allow unpredictable  people,
+which means most people in most places need to be impervious
+to reason. Society needs filters to find these people.  Once
+found, they  can be put  into positions of power  where they
+will behave as predicted by those who get to put people into
+places;  their own  generators will  not interfere  with the
+generators of the people above them.
+
 When I was  in middle school I read A  Brief History of Time
 and  learned  that  Albert Einstein  claimed  that  calculus
 proves  Parmenides right:  time is  an illusion.   Two years
 later  I dropped  out of  high school  and took  calculus at
 University of  Connecticut.  No  one in my  calculus classes
 ever  talked  about  Parmenides.  Why  not?   Maybe  because
-Einstein  may  be  right:  calculus may  be  able  to  prove
+Einstein  could be  right:  calculus may  be  able to  prove
 something.  Then the students  could be changed, set against
 their parents like by Jesus'  sword.  In fact these students
 are meant to change and to change the world -- later.  First
@@ -245,17 +275,19 @@ new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo, integrate  this
 expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
 made a movie about it, but it sucked.
 
-Somehow it does not matter what the material that is taught,
-the effect is never felt. When I read Nineteen Eighty-Four I
-already had  prisoner consciousness, but no  one could tell,
-before or  after. In secret, I  wrote many more  essays than
-they  asked for. (Maybe  they  could tell,  and really  they
-forced me out.) Don't they just need to keep the volume high
-and the frequency constant? You can safely be given anything
-to skim-read semi-process without  ever feeling what you are
-doing  enough  to be  unpredictable.   Just  prove you  can;
-thirty hours a week for eight years in a row; then you'll be
-ready.  The medium is the message.
+Somehow  it  does  not  matter what  is  the  material  that
+is   taught;  the   effect  is   never  felt. When   I  read
+Nineteen  Eighty-Four in  9th grade  I already  had prisoner
+consciousness, but  no one  could tell, before  or after. In
+secret, I wrote many more essays than they asked for. (Maybe
+they  /could/ tell,  and really  they forced  me out.) Don't
+they just  need to  keep the volume  high and  the frequency
+constant? I evaded  mind control  by skipping  their reading
+and doing  my own. If the bandwidth  control is sufficiently
+tight then you  can safely be given  /anything/ to skim-read
+and  semi-process without  ever feeling  what you  are doing
+enough to become unpredictable.   Just prove you can; thirty
+hours a week for eight years in a row; then you'll be ready.
 
 The body  could mutate the  immunohistocompatibility complex
 selectively  using  genetic  information  derived  from  the
@@ -272,18 +304,20 @@ in  the  use of  "fashion"  synonymous  with game  theoretic
 roshambo, rock paper scissors, a game of knowing the context
 ahead of time somehow, of being more connected to the future
 ultimately;  less so  than to  the past;  the recent  may be
-forgotten  for  a  reason;  maybe some  kernel  to  save  be
+forgotten for  a reason;  maybe some kernel  to save  can be
 extracted.   Being that  connected to  the future  means not
-just knowing but changing the future; is it the only way?
+just knowing but changing the future; is that the only way?
 
 The  immune system  violates  the central  dogma already  by
 storing generated antibody  DNA differentially in proportion
 to  its binding  strength  to foreign  proteins.  The  whole
 purpose  of  the  adaptive   immune  system  is  to  extract
-information from  protein.  It  is a protein  sensory organ.
+information from  protein.  It  is a  protein-sensory organ.
 It  derives the  underivable  using  a horizontal  knowledge
 connection.  It breaks through // un ex pex tid lee like the
-Wu.  Hack the genome.
+Wu.   Hack the  genome.   Get to  know  someone.  Not  their
+categorizations and  spacializations, their  generators.  Or
+are they really the same thing?
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge
@@ -305,16 +339,17 @@ local  exceptions non-locally  is  good distributed  systems
 design; keeping the  local system simpler by  only making it
 complex  enough to  handle the  most unexceptional  pathway;
 these  people are  constructed by  the system  itself to  be
-barely complex enough to handle the normal case; conflicting
+barely complex enough to handle the normal case; which is to
+say the predictable, non-generating subordinate; conflicting
 are  a  disciplinary   control  structure's  enforcement  of
 normality  vs.  the  ability   to  detect  the  exceptional;
 behavioral control prevents  measurement; in general control
 prevents measurement;  control cannot  measure what  it also
 determines. Trying to control people never works for me even
-when it does. Upshift the phase of anyone and they pop right
-out of these  horrible crystal lattices like  a neutrino; as
-in nobody notices; don't trust  me because you don't want to
-know.)
+when it does. Upshift the phase  of anyone even by a quarter
+quantum  and they  pop  right out  of  these horrid  crystal
+lattices like a neutrino; as  in nobody notices; don't trust
+me because you don't want to know.)
 
 The frontal lobe  is the site of the  executive function; it
 is there that  memories of knowledge and  emotions past come
@@ -339,11 +374,29 @@ took  50  million  years of  accumulated  culture. Isn't  it
 only  the  accumulated  culture itself  that  the  computers
 understand?
 
+Somehow  it  does  not  matter what  is  the  material  that
+is   taught,  the   effect  is   never  felt. When   I  read
+Nineteen  Eighty-Four in  9th grade  I already  had prisoner
+consciousness, but  no one  could tell, before  or after. In
+secret, I wrote many more essays than they asked for. (Maybe
+they  /could/ tell,  and really  they forced  me out.) Don't
+they just  need to  keep the volume  high and  the frequency
+constant? I  evaded  control  by  skipping  the  reading. If
+the  bandwidth  control is  tight  then  you can  safely  be
+given /anything/ to skim-read  and semi-process without ever
+feeling what  you are doing enough  to become unpredictable.
+Just prove you can; thirty hours a week for eight years in a
+row; then you'll be ready.  The medium is the message.  What
+are they  filtering us for? All  of the kids today  have the
+internet already, but they don't  know what the internet is,
+so they are still (more?) disconnected.
+
 A  narrative  or  linear  structure  implies  some  kind  of
 intentional  emotional manipulation  performed on  a mammal,
 while  a proof  structured according  to its  own logic  can
 specify the  logical and  informational dependencies  of its
-conclusion in any order.  Way to make sure no one reads it.
+conclusion in any order.  Way to  make sure no one reads it.
+The compiler will not even notice.
 
 A proof is a program which means it not merely a conclusion,
 but  a   new  capability;  the  capability   to  generate  a
@@ -354,13 +407,19 @@ It is  exactly the thing institutions  must exterminate like
 an infection, internally.   Their face to the  public is the
 individuals selected  for their  highest immunity to  it.  I
 got your back  but you best to watch your  front // coz it's
-the jivas who front // whose pullin stunts.
+the jivas who front // they be pullin stunts.
+
+If I was  right about the uterus then they'd  talk about me.
+Someone would read  this.  It would be, like,  big. But if I
+was right about the prophets  that wouldn't change who would
+listen.
 
-If  I was  right about  the  uterus then  they'd talk  about
-me.  Someone would  read this.  It would  be, like, big. But
-if I was  right about the prophets that  wouldn't change who
-would listen.  If someone really wanted to be a body without
-organs they would just put in the time.
+If someone  really wanted to  be a body without  organs they
+would  just put  in the  time.   Yet probably  if they  even
+thought about that then they  already made the opposite time
+commitment.  Either  way someone  already made  the opposite
+time commitment  for them before they  were born. A person's
+foes shall be they of their own household.
 
 There  is the  "BITE"  model of  cult programming,  behavior
 information  thought and  emotion  control; institutions  in