1 files changed, 157 insertions, 136 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index fd30b31..1fa2116 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-Human Communication
-  or
-Follow the logic of the knowledge
+Human Communication or__ Follow the logic of the knowledge
 
 
 
@@ -8,17 +6,10 @@ Human beings  can transmit to one  another two fundamentally
 different  types of  communication: (1)  data (2)  programs.
 Programs are the same thing as  proofs and the same thing as
 Russellian denotations; they have the "sense" that mere/pure
-data lacks.   They have the  power that data does  not have,
-to transmit  knowledge rather  than information. Information
-creates  knowledge about  transmission  but cannot  transmit
-knowledge, because knowledge  to be "real" or  "live" in the
-physical brain  ("known" as opposed to  merely "imaginable";
-it has to be a generator of behaviors; which means it has to
-be a  physical form that  has energy metabolism in  order to
-satisfy  its  computational  needs;  but of  course  not  an
-"independent" energy  metabolism nor its own  cell membrane;
-but it does  have its own forms  of informational membranes;
-we shall address them.)
+data lacks.  They have the power that data does not have, to
+transmit  knowledge  rather than  information.   Information
+can  /create/ knowledge  (about transmission)  but does  not
+/transmit/ knowledge.
 
 However,  it must  be  understood that  programs are  highly
 sensitive to their runtime  environments and for that reason
@@ -26,24 +17,25 @@ their robustness  is an extremely difficult  problem akin to
 the robustness  of life in natural  habitats. Human cultural
 programs are  high reliability systems which  means they are
 chaotic  systems that  have phase  after phase  to downshift
-through  (articulated joints  through  which  to roll  over)
-as  they take  damage  and heal  from  it by  phase-changing
-back   up  over   (computational)  time   (rewriting  mental
-programs to  account for unhandled or  mishandled conditions
-while  keeping  the  programs   running  continuously  in  a
-degraded state). Knock out  multiple random chunks, portions
-of  program  degenerate  into  data,  and  the  whole  still
-runs. Human cultural programs are far beyond what average or
-even  elite programmers  can hope  to construct  in computer
-systems;  they  have  been constructed  by  one-in-a-million
-prophets  who  were  able   to  fully  absorb  their  entire
-local   culture   and  reprogram   themselves   individually
-based  on   reverse  engineering  that  culture   to  become
-(themselves, as individuals)  generators of self-propagating
-regenerator-generators of  universal culture. Their programs
-are constructed in  such a universal way as  to be rewritten
-generation after  generation according to the  local runtime
-environment,   while  preserving   an  evolving   kernel  to
+through (articulated  joints through which to  roll over) as
+they take  damage and  heal from  it by  phase-changing back
+up  over  (computational)  time (rewriting  mental  programs
+to  account for  unhandled  or  mishandled conditions  while
+keeping  the programs  running  continuously  in a  degraded
+state).   Knock  out  multiple random  chunks,  portions  of
+program degenerate  into data, and  the whole still  runs in
+the designed  way, and  will even  recover the  lost portion
+over  time. Human  cultural  programs are  far  beyond  what
+average or even elite "professional" programmers can hope to
+construct in  computer systems;  they have  been constructed
+by  one-in-a-million   prophets  who  were  able   to  fully
+absorb their  entire local culture and  reprogram themselves
+individually based  on reverse  engineering that  culture to
+become (themselves,  as individual human  beings) generators
+of self-propagating  generators of  universal culture. Their
+programs are  constructed in such  a universal way as  to be
+rewritten generation after generation according to the local
+runtime environment, while preserving  an evolving kernel to
 re-generate slightly adapted kernels  again and again in new
 environments -- in such a way  that the kernel picks up each
 new  environment's knowledge  and carries  it into  the next
@@ -58,13 +50,13 @@ system's  antibody-generating  cells. These have  mechanisms
 that induce the production of  novelty, localizing it to one
 part of  the DNA strand, while  circumscribing every novelty
 with proof of provenance used  to protect the system against
-foreign novelty  (a single  recognizable DNA strand  that is
+foreign novelty.  (A single  recognizable DNA strand that is
 the same for every antibody;  that is, its coded protein has
 a  strong chemical  binding  to a  matching  protein in  the
 immunohistocompatibility complex (an  FC receptor); called a
 transporter, it functions like  a passport -- an unforgeable
 signature  that  must  be   presented  to  pass  the  filter
-mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance). The word kernel  is to
+mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance.) The word kernel  is to
 be interpreted as in the algebraic structure: a generator is
 preserved across a morphism.
 
@@ -88,16 +80,19 @@ thing if  you are into analogies  YUCK.) That super-organism
 in  turn progressively  jettisoned  as Humanity  transitions
 into  its  cultural   message-passing  super-organism  phase
 where  all Earth  life  must survive  in symbiotic  exchange
-with, or  as constituent  elements of, Earth's  unique human
-biosocial ecomachine originating  chronologically before the
-origination of any biological Earth human. (In fact Humanity
-remains the mammalian substrate  but human subjectivity (the
-"us"  that "we"  think "we"  are even  as we  call ourselves
-human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose
-social systems  of self-preservation dominate  the mammalian
-levers mostly  just by  spacialization --  I mean,  it ain't
-hard);  but remnants  of the  old systems  always exist  and
-indeed exist  as the  foundations of  the newer  systems and
+with,  or  as  constituent  elements  of,  Earth's  singular
+(unique) human/biosocial eco-machine;  a phase of biological
+evolution without any fundamental dependence on sampling the
+environment  through differential  reproduction or  survival
+of  DNA-based life;  originating chronologically  before the
+origination of any biological Earth human.  While biological
+humanity remains the mammalian substrate, human subjectivity
+(the  "us" that  "we" think  "we" are  as we  call ourselves
+human)  is  produced  by the  cultural  distributed  program
+(whose  social  systems  of self-preservation  dominate  the
+mammalian levers mostly just by spacialization -- I mean, it
+ain't hard). But  remnants of  the old systems  always exist
+and indeed exist as the foundations of the newer systems and
 abstractions are  leaky and the  new stuff only has  to work
 just-better  than the  old stuff  so it  isn't ever  all the
 way  there --  you  know  how it  goes. (There  is always  a
@@ -107,25 +102,27 @@ exist to  be found;  though it may  be unconnectable  to the
 local region.)
 
 (Computational  phase spaces  means  how many  computational
-states  can  it   cycle  through,  or  how   much  does  the
-novelty  generator   repeat.   Phases  are   "upshifted"  to
-have  more  states  by  application of  processing  time  to
-acquired  knowledge.  A  construction process  searching for
-more  efficient  internal  data structures  results  in  the
-discovery of "external" or "objective" structure; the use of
-structure  to simplify  the  generator  makes more  synapses
-available to represent more structure allowing the search to
-continue  without  consuming  synpases.   A  compression  of
-more  information  into  smaller  computational  structures.
-The  generator is  the compressed  structure in  which human
-thought computation  takes place;  a signal  processor; feed
-in  facts  to generate  conclusions  but  feed in  noise  to
-generate imaginations; either way, what is generated will be
-filtered  elsewhere according  to the  present state  of the
-multiple  shifting  connections  of  the  frontal  lobe  and
-its  external/bodily  hormonal-emotional  Mammalian  control
-structures. The  cultural super-organism  will surely  be to
-Mammalia as Eukarya to the microbial mats.)
+states can  it cycle through,  or how much does  the novelty
+generator  repeat.   Phases  are "upshifted"  to  have  more
+states  by  application  of   processing  time  to  acquired
+knowledge.   A  construction   process  searching  for  more
+efficient internal data structures  results in the discovery
+of  "external"  or  "objective" structure  in  "the  world";
+the  use  of  data   structure  to  simplify  the  generator
+makes  more  synapses  available,  allowing  the  search  to
+make  progress without  consuming  synpases.  A  compression
+of  more information  into smaller  computational structures
+increases its  speed and provides new  logical and emotional
+connectivities.  The  generator is the  compressed structure
+in  which human  thought computation  takes place;  a signal
+processor; feed  in facts  to generate conclusions  but feed
+in  noise  to generate  imaginations;  either  way, what  is
+generated  will  be  filtered  elsewhere  according  to  the
+present state  of the  multiple shifting connections  of the
+frontal  lobe  and  its  external/bodily  hormonal-emotional
+Mammalian  control  structures. The cultural  super-organism
+will  surely be  to  Mammalia as  Eukarya  to the  microbial
+mats.)
 
 Haskell  monads  show  us  how algebraic  morphisms  are  as
 intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank  you Mr. Quine. But these
@@ -159,20 +156,18 @@ side-effects   like  inducing   speculative  investment   in
 external investigative  exploration. The basic  framework is
 of  an   information-gathering  future-predictor-controller;
 reprogramming  it  involves  loops  through  to  the  world;
-
-Erlang-style message-passing; such  a specialist-y thing and
-yet it's the simplest kind of  structure; it must exist in a
-thousand places; there must be  a hundred apt analogies; but
-it is only one thing and that is an algorithm, or a program,
-or  a  communication  of  the most  powerful  sort  that  is
-possible  between  human  beings;  and it  is  that  precise
-algorithm  that has  been mathematically  identified, broken
-down into  its constituent  axioms like  a protein  into its
-originating DNA code points,  by the Erlang literature.  And
-the reason  for all  that is  that it  is the  foundation of
-stability of long-running  "autophagic" distributed systems;
-I call them  "tissue" systems because the cells  of a living
-tissue replace themselves similarly.
+reprogramming it involves loops  through to the world; these
+loops through the  world seem so confusing  to people trying
+to learn Erlang  that it seems like I should  try to explain
+them!  But there is no time,  so I will sum up: the progam's
+self is  a message but the  self is virtual, the  self is an
+experiment, and the self needs to be destroyed.  First, make
+a copy, then collide it with  the world (your body will also
+collide) then compare its  shape to the original.  Collision
+provides knowledge to decide whether  to destroy the copy or
+destroy the original.   What is not destroyed  can be copied
+into another node.  It  works because neighboring nodes pick
+up dropped messages.  It wouldn't work if they competed.
 
 (Knowledge  can exist  in  a degraded,  not-fully-replicable
 form;  neutered, locally  contained,  but potentially  still
@@ -217,9 +212,10 @@ their  upstream library  vendor SolarWinds. This  attack was
 relatively harmless because it was performed by a government
 that only wanted some subtle spy  shit rather than an act of
 war or terrorist maximizing destruction, I mean I guess, who
-knows what they did).  Time  to process.  Can't get the time
-of  day from  someone who  doesn't  want to  spend the  time
-thinking whether you just want the time of day.
+knows  what they  did.   Luckily they  didn't  get into  the
+innermost kernel of human culture.)  Time to process.  Can't
+get  the time  of day  from someone  who doesn't  spend time
+thinking whether you really just want the time of day.
 
 Capitalism and school might  be seen operationally as denial
 of  service  attacks   on  their  constituent  subordinates'
@@ -239,19 +235,27 @@ By working  backward from  the conclusion  the mathematician
 will construct  a proof  "from both  ends" toward  a middle.
 The conclusion is in sight  long before the bridge is built.
 The  fear response  precedes  the conclusion.   Loss of  the
-binding connection  in the  imaginary can produce  the fear.
+binding connection  in the imaginary can  produce fear.  The
+fear emotion  can deactivate the  search for the  next step.
 Thus can a binding lock the  phase of the bound.  (With some
 emotions you can jump the gap; you might land on error.)
 
-Wasn't  Foucault's   point  in  the  History   of  Sexuality
-vol. 3 that  the cultural  practice of  copying prohibitions
-disguises the intentional  construction of positive desires?
-Auto-immune   tolerance   isn't  accomplished   by   copying
-prohibitions  into  new  generators  (pruning  their  search
-trees)  but  by  filtering  already-existing  generators  of
-novelty either  into places  where they  will be  allowed to
-generate further or  else places where they  can be recycled
-as energy.
+Foucault  said  in  History  of Sexuality  Vol. 3  that  the
+cultural  practice  of  copying prohibitions  disguises  the
+intentional construction  of positive  desires.  Auto-immune
+tolerance  isn't accomplished  by copying  prohibitions into
+new generators (pruning their search trees) but by filtering
+already-existing  generators of  novelty either  into places
+where  they will  be  allowed to  generate  further or  else
+places  where  they can  be  recycled  as energy.   However,
+it  all  takes  place  in a  context  where  the  generators
+are  always-already  "pruned"  because they  are  raised  in
+a  "whitelist"  type  environment   where  the  elements  of
+composition  are  provided;   and  composing  with  elements
+not  provided is  made  unthinkable.   A "blacklist"  filter
+algorithm is in principle able  to be much more liberal than
+a "whitelist" one; which is to say it empowers unpredictable
+generators, who potentially shift the phase of the whole.
 
 The search tree of the mental  generator does not need to be
 pruned if  you can  exploit the  mind's lack  of idempotence
@@ -262,27 +266,36 @@ search breadth and encounter a  big picture view.  Maybe the
 point  is,  instead  of thinking  about  which  prohibitions
 are  copied, or  which generated  outputs are  pruned, think
 about  which  generators  get destroyed  or  prevented  from
-running.  Most  places in society can't  allow unpredictable
-people, which  means most people  in most places need  to be
-impervious to  reason. Society needs  filters to  find these
-people.  Once found, they can be put into positions of power
+running.  Each generator is  a unique program (or algorithm)
+that in  principle can be identified  mathematically ("up to
+isomorphism");  in  practice we  could  at  least name  some
+categories.
+
+Most  places in  society can't  allow unpredictable  people,
+which means most people in most places need to be impervious
+to reason. Society  needs filters to identify  these people.
+Once identified,  they can  be put  into positions  of power
 where  they will  behave as  predicted by  those who  get to
 put  people into  places;  subordinate  generators will  not
 interfere with superordinate generators because they will be
-constructed  by  selection  to  be always  trapped  in  some
-local thought system. Foucault was  the historian of thought
-systems and  that is very  abstract and powerful yes  like a
-true mathematician  with rigor (!!)  but we still  care more
-about the people in the systems than the systems and want to
-go back to that mammal  meat perspective where we might feel
-something.  But  the people aren't "in"  the thought system;
-they're  products  of  the  thought  system;  they're  in  a
-social message exchange  network that is a  system; and that
-system propagates social  network extension prohibitions not
-necessarily by explicit prohibitory  rules /nor/ by any kind
-of /management/  of desire (though that  may be attempted!),
-but  by occupying  all time  where unmanaged  bindings could
-form.
+constructed by selection to be  always trapped in some local
+thought system.  The generator is apparently blanket-trained
+to run only in  specific contexts; spontaneous generation in
+the /general/ context is the unthinkable: it's logging in as
+root!  Developing on the production server!
+
+Foucault was  the historian of  thought systems and  that is
+very  abstract and  powerful yes  like a  true mathematician
+with rigor (!!)  but we still care more about  the people in
+the systems  than the systems  and want  to go back  to that
+mammal meat perspective where  we might feel something.  But
+the people aren't "in"  the thought system; they're products
+of the thought system; they're  in a social message exchange
+network that is a system;  and that system propagates social
+network extension  prohibitions not necessarily  by explicit
+prohibitory  rules  /nor/ by  any  kind  of /management/  of
+desire (though that may be attempted!), but by occupying all
+time where unmanaged bindings could form.
 
 When I was  in middle school I read A  Brief History of Time
 and  learned  that  Albert Einstein  claimed  that  calculus
@@ -300,13 +313,9 @@ Only then will  they be permitted a chance to  compete for a
 seat at the  mic where some lucky MC gets  to spit something
 new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo, integrate  this
 expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
-made a  movie about it, but  it sucked.  Like why  would you
-put literal death  into the movie what a  fucking downer, it
-doesn't help how he ended up unlike Michael Jackson where it
-works like Man in the Mirror really works now in retrospect.
-Robin Williams  went to Julliard  which means he  was pretty
-well socially  integrated doesn't  it so maybe  those movies
-sucked for a reason.
+made a movie  about it, but it sucked.   Robin Williams went
+to  Juilliard  (he was  deeply  integrated  into the  social
+mainstream) so maybe those movies sucked for a reason.
 
 Somehow  it  does  not  matter what  is  the  material  that
 is   taught;  the   effect  is   never  felt. When   I  read
@@ -318,9 +327,10 @@ they just  need to  keep the volume  high and  the frequency
 constant? I evaded  mind control  by skipping  their reading
 and doing  my own. If the bandwidth  control is sufficiently
 tight then you  can safely be given  /anything/ to skim-read
-and  semi-process without  ever feeling  what you  are doing
-enough to become unpredictable.   Just prove you can; thirty
-hours a week for eight years in a row; then you'll be ready.
+and semi-process without ever feeling anything from what you
+are doing  enough to  become unpredictable.  Just  prove you
+can; thirty  hours a  week for  eight years  in a  row; then
+you'll be ready.
 
 The body  could mutate the  immunohistocompatibility complex
 selectively  using  genetic  information  derived  from  the
@@ -335,17 +345,18 @@ built  already one  bridge  through the  placenta?  But  the
 immune system is the specialized manager of genetic fashion,
 in  the  use of  "fashion"  synonymous  with game  theoretic
 roshambo,  rock  paper  scissors,  a game  of  knowing  some
-ephemeral context;  disposable knowledge; maybe  some kernel
+ephemeral context;  disposable knowledge. Maybe  some kernel
 worth saving can be extracted.
 
 The  immune system  violates  the central  dogma already  by
 storing generated antibody  DNA differentially in proportion
-to  its binding  strength  to foreign  proteins.  The  whole
-purpose  of  the  adaptive   immune  system  is  to  extract
-information from  protein.  It  is a  protein-sensory organ.
-It  derives the  underivable  using  a horizontal  knowledge
-connection.  It breaks through // un ex pex tid lee like the
-Wu.   Hack the  genome.   Get to  know  someone.
+to its binding strength to foreign proteins.
+
+The  whole  purpose of  the  adaptive  immune system  is  to
+extract information  from protein.  It is  a protein-sensory
+organ.   It  derives  the  underivable  using  a  horizontal
+knowledge transmission.  It breaks through // like the Wu //
+un ex pex tid lee.  Hack the genome.  Get to know someone.
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge
@@ -395,9 +406,9 @@ mathematicians or  programmers or anybody but  to spend time
 analyzing  concrete  possibilities  for  reconfiguration  of
 local resources,  whereby the basic abstract  structures and
 shapes  will be  realized  in the  concrete  forms of  their
-combinations. However if  you were  a shape  builder serious
-about  building shapes  then you  would want  to know  about
-shapes in their most general form as I am and do.
+combinations. However if  you were  a serious  shape builder
+you would  want to know  about shapes in their  most general
+form as I am and do.
 
 The thing is  that I didn't prove that there  is a morphism,
 but I  don't have to prove  to know.  Proving it  would be a
@@ -460,14 +471,24 @@ prohibitions!)
 
 If I was  right about the uterus then they'd  talk about me.
 Someone would read  this.  It would be, like,  big. But if I
-was right about the prophets that wouldn't change anything.
-
-If someone  really wanted to  be a body without  organs they
-would just put in the time.   Yet probably if they ever came
-to learn about that then they already made the opposite time
-commitment.  Either  way someone  already made  the opposite
-time  commitment on  their behalf  before they  were born. A
-person's foes shall be they of their own household.
+was right about the  prophets that wouldn't change anything.
+I feel the opposite way though.
+
+Someone who really wanted to  be a body without organs would
+put in the  time.  Yet if they encountered  the body without
+organs  concept then  they probably  made the  opposite time
+commitment.  Either way, someone else made the opposite time
+commitment on their behalf before they were born. A person's
+foes shall be they of their own household.
+
+It's like how  if someone hates you because  they don't know
+anything about you, it's that they don't know anything about
+you because they  hate you.  If you want your  beliefs to be
+path independent  then you  commit yourself  to continuously
+re-evaluating the whole. Either you commit to idempotence or
+not. Either you  commit to path independence,  or you commit
+to a path.  It's not  a prohibition; it's a time commitment.
+If you don't spend your time that way then you didn't do it.
 
 There  is the  "BITE"  model of  cult programming,  behavior
 information  thought and  emotion  control; institutions  in