human-communication.txt

1 files changed, 127 insertions, 80 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index ab7b915..7200164 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -7,28 +7,28 @@ Follow the logic of the knowledge
 
 Human beings  can transmit to one  another two fundamentally
 different  types of  communication: (1)  data (2)  programs.
-Programs  are  the  same  thing   as  proofs  and  the  same
-thing  as  Russellian  denotations; they  have  the  "sense"
-that  data  structures  lack.   They  have  the  power  that
-data  does  not  have,  to transmit  knowledge  rather  than
-information. However,  it must  be understood  that programs
-are highly  sensitive to their runtime  environments and for
-that  reason robustness  is an  extremely difficult  problem
-akin to  the robustness  of life in  natural habitats. Human
-cultural programs  are high reliability systems  which means
-they  are chaotic  systems that  have phase  after phase  to
-downshift through (articulated joints  through which to roll
-over) as they take damage and heal from it by phase-changing
-back up over (computational) time (rewriting mental programs
-to  account for  unhandled  or  mishandled conditions  while
-keeping  the programs  running  continuously  in a  degraded
-state). Human cultural programs are  far beyond what average
-or even elite  programmers can hope to  construct; they have
-been constructed by one-in-a-million  prophets who were able
-to  fully absorb  their entire  local culture  and reprogram
+Programs are the same thing as  proofs and the same thing as
+Russellian denotations; they have the "sense" that mere/pure
+data lacks.  They have the power that data does not have, to
+transmit knowledge rather than information. However, it must
+be understood  that programs  are highly sensitive  to their
+runtime environments and for that reason their robustness is
+an  extremely  difficult  problem  akin  to  the  robustness
+of  life in  natural habitats. Human  cultural programs  are
+high  reliability  systems  which  means  they  are  chaotic
+systems  that have  phase after  phase to  downshift through
+(articulated joints through which to roll over) as they take
+damage  and heal  from  it by  phase-changing  back up  over
+(computational) time  (rewriting mental programs  to account
+for  unhandled or  mishandled conditions  while keeping  the
+programs  running continuously  in a  degraded state). Human
+cultural  programs  are  far  beyond what  average  or  even
+elite  programmers can  hope  to construct;  they have  been
+constructed by  one-in-a-million prophets  who were  able to
+fully  absorb  their  entire  local  culture  and  reprogram
 themselves  individually based  on reverse  engineering that
 culture  to become  (themselves, as  individuals) generators
-of  self-propagating   generator-regenerators  of  universal
+of  self-propagating   regenerator-generators  of  universal
 culture. Their programs are constructed  in such a universal
 way as to be rewritten generation after generation according
 to  the  local  runtime  environment,  while  preserving  an
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ that the  kernel picks  up each new  environment's knowledge
 and  carries  it  into  the  next  without  losing  what  it
 learned  of  the  previous  environment  --  that  is  their
 robustness. It  is again  and  above  the genetic  principle
-of  DNA  described  by Schrodinger;  but  Schrodinger  wrote
-before DNA was  discovered; so also before  discovery of the
+of DNA first described by Schrodinger; but Schrodinger wrote
+before DNA was discovered; so also before discovery of the
 structure  of controlled  mutation  in life's  environmental
 sampling  mechanism; so  again instead  is the  artificially
 bred/genetically  engineered  DNA  of  the  immune  system's
@@ -63,32 +63,37 @@ an   algebra  of   sexual  reproduction   that  includes   a
 mechanism  amplifying  reproductive   success  of  males  in
 Eukaryotes  providing an  information-accumulation advantage
 by  more reliably  capturing  novelty on  the Y  chromosome,
-which  was  later  jettisoned  in  the  human  lineage  when
-Animalia  transitioned  into  the  Mammalian  super-organism
-phase  which  gave  the  next  level  of  meta-advantage  in
-information  accumulation as  group-shared emotions  applied
-distributed computation to  sensory information turning e.g.
-individualized  sight  into  area  surveillance  (Eukaryotic
-sexual  sampling  came  into  conflict  with  high  parental
-investment  involved   in  non-genetic   but  still-vertical
-transfer  of acquired  environmental  knowledge,  a sort  of
+progressively jettisoned  along the Mammalia  lineage toward
+a  super-organism  phase  which   gave  the  next  level  of
+meta-advantage in  information accumulation  as group-shared
+emotions   applied   distributed  computation   to   sensory
+information  turning  e.g.  individualized sight  into  area
+surveillance in the simpler mammals but only message-passing
+of   programs  in   advanced  primates   (Eukaryotic  sexual
+sampling came  into conflict  with high  parental investment
+involved in  non-genetic but still-vertical  transmission of
+acquired  environmental  knowledge/connectivity, a  sort  of
 Lamarckian  epigenetic  thing  if  you  are  into  analogies
 YUCK);  that   super-organism  was  again   jettisoned  when
 Humanity  transitioned  into  its  cultural  message-passing
-super-organism phase (in fact Humanity remains the mammalian
-substrate but  human subjectivity (the "us"  that "we" think
-"we" are  even as  we call ourselves  human) is  produced by
-the  cultural distributed  program whose  social systems  of
-self-preservation dominate the  mammalian levers mostly just
-by spacialization -- I mean, it ain't hard); but remnants of
-the  old  systems  always  exist and  indeed  exist  as  the
-foundations of the newer  systems and abstractions are leaky
-and the new stuff only has  to work just-better than the old
-stuff so it isn't ever all the  way there -- you know how it
-goes. (There  is always  a  residue  of apparent  randomness
-left unaccounted  for by the locally-known  structure where,
-surely, more  structure does  exist to  be found;  though it
-may  be unconnectable  to  the  local region.)
+super-organism phase  where all  Earth life must  survive in
+symbiotic  exchange with  or  as constituent  elements of  a
+single social machine originating chronologically before the
+origination of any biological Earth human (in fact Humanity
+remains the mammalian substrate  but human subjectivity (the
+"us"  that "we"  think "we"  are even  as we  call ourselves
+human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose
+social systems  of self-preservation dominate  the mammalian
+levers mostly  just by  spacialization --  I mean,  it ain't
+hard);  but remnants  of the  old systems  always exist  and
+indeed exist  as the  foundations of  the newer  systems and
+abstractions are  leaky and the  new stuff only has  to work
+just-better  than the  old stuff  so it  isn't ever  all the
+way  there --  you  know  how it  goes. (There  is always  a
+residue of  apparent randomness left unaccounted  for by the
+locally-known structure  where, surely, more  structure does
+exist to  be found;  though it may  be unconnectable  to the
+local region.)
 
 (Computational  phase spaces  means  how many  computational
 states  can  it   cycle  through,  or  how   much  does  the
@@ -109,7 +114,7 @@ filtered  elsewhere according  to the  present state  of the
 multiple  shifting  connections  of  the  frontal  lobe  and
 its  external/bodily  hormonal-emotional  Mammalian  control
 structures. The  cultural super-organism  will surely  be to
-Mammalia as the Eukaryotes were to the microbial mats.)
+Mammalia as Eukarya were to the microbial mats.)
 
 Haskell  monads  show  us  how algebraic  morphisms  are  as
 intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank  you Mr. Quine. But these
@@ -125,6 +130,20 @@ is not enough to transmit  knowledge. When was the last time
 you taught  a child that  2+2=4? Maybe the people  who think
 they know 2+2=4 don't know they're faking.
 
+The thing is  that I didn't prove that there  is a morphism,
+but I  don't have to prove  to know it's there.   Proving it
+would be a matter of writing the program, yet somehow I know
+what can  be proved  without proving  it, because  I somehow
+know whether I can write the program before writing it.  But
+of course  I have  been wrong  before; that  is why  my next
+rhyme style  will be the code  poem. It is funny that  it is
+easier to prove  things to computers than to  humans; it was
+easier for humans to build something to understand them than
+to be understood! but  not really because building computers
+took  50  million  years of  accumulated  culture. Isn't  it
+only  the  accumulated  culture itself  that  the  computers
+understand?
+
 Memory  transmits  only   memory.   Knowledge  can  transmit
 either  memory or  sometimes knowledge.   The recipient  can
 interpret  proof as  information  (store it)  or as  program
@@ -151,20 +170,19 @@ a copy, then collide it with  the world (your body will also
 collide) then compare its  shape to the original.  Collision
 provides  the  knowledge  necessary  to  decide  whether  to
 destroy the copy or the original.  What is not destroyed can
-be copied into another node.
+be  copied into  another node.
 
 (Knowledge  can exist  in  a degraded,  not-fully-replicable
 form;  neutered, locally  contained,  but potentially  still
 activated locally.   Such knowledge or  internal programming
-may  be   unavailable  for   mental  debugging  as   if  its
-source  code were  unavailable. When  knowledge is  filtered
-out  by  connection  to  fear  in  the  executive  function,
-it  may  appear  to  have  this  neutered  locally-activated
-form. Resolving  the   emotional  response   could  activate
-neutered  knowledge and/or  cause first-time  replication of
-knowledge previously  unreplicable. The initiated processing
-requires  an  unpredictable  amount  of  computing  time  to
-complete.)
+may be  unavailable for  mental debugging  as if  its source
+code  were unavailable. When  knowledge is  filtered out  by
+connection to fear in the  executive function, it may appear
+to  have  this  neutered  locally-activated  form. Resolving
+the  emotional response  could activate  apparently-neutered
+knowledge and/or  cause first-time replication  of knowledge
+previously  unreplicable. The initiated  processing requires
+an unpredictable amount of computing time to complete.)
 
 This power  makes them dangerous;  for the same  reason that
 computer  systems  control  access to  programming  features
@@ -195,9 +213,10 @@ in  a  software supply  chain  attack  on Microsoft  through
 their  upstream library  vendor SolarWinds. This  attack was
 relatively harmless because it was performed by a government
 that only wanted  some spy shit rather than one  at war or a
-terrorist who  wanted to  maximize destruction).   Can't get
-the time of  day from someone who doesn't want  to spend the
-time thinking whether you just want the time of day.
+terrorist  who wanted  to  maximize  destruction).  Time  to
+process.  Can't get the time of day from someone who doesn't
+want to  spend the time  thinking whether you just  want the
+time of day.
 
 Capitalism and school might  be seen operationally as denial
 of  service  attacks   on  their  constituent  subordinates'
@@ -217,27 +236,52 @@ By working  backward from  the conclusion  the mathematician
 will construct  a proof  "from both  ends" toward  a middle.
 The conclusion is in sight  long before the bridge is built.
 The  fear response  precedes  the conclusion.   Loss of  the
-binding connection can produce the fear.  Thus can a binding
-lock the  phase of the  bound.  (With some emotions  you can
-jump the gap; you might land on error.)
+binding connection  in the  imaginary can produce  the fear.
+Thus can a binding lock the  phase of the bound.  (With some
+emotions you can jump the gap; you might land on error.)
 
 When I was  in middle school I read A  Brief History of Time
 and  learned  that  Albert Einstein  claimed  that  calculus
 proves  Parmenides right:  time is  an illusion.   Two years
-later  I  dropped  out  of high  school  and  took  calculus
-at  University  of  Connecticut.   No  one  in  my  calculus
-or  analysis  classes  ever talked  about  Parmenides.   Why
-not?  Maybe because  Einstein may be right:  calculus may be
-able  to  prove  something.   Then  the  students  could  be
-changed, set against their parents like by Jesus' sword.  In
-fact these  students are meant  to change and to  change the
-world -- later.  First they  must pass through the Thymus of
-society proving they have  inscribed its inherited knowledge
-into their shape.  Only then will they be permitted a chance
-to compete for a seat at the mic where some lucky MC gets to
-spit  something new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo,
-integrate  this expression.   But don't  integrate too  far.
-Robin Williams made a movie about that, but it sucked.
+later  I dropped  out of  high school  and took  calculus at
+University of  Connecticut.  No  one in my  calculus classes
+ever  talked  about  Parmenides.  Why  not?   Maybe  because
+Einstein  may  be  right:  calculus may  be  able  to  prove
+something.  Then the students  could be changed, set against
+their parents like by Jesus'  sword.  In fact these students
+are meant to change and to change the world -- later.  First
+they must  pass through the  Thymus of society  proving they
+have  inscribed its  inherited knowledge  into their  shape.
+Only then will  they be permitted a chance to  compete for a
+seat at the  mic where some lucky MC gets  to spit something
+new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo, integrate  this
+expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
+made a movie about that, but it sucked.
+
+The body  could mutate the  immunohistocompatibility complex
+using  genetic  information  derived  from  the  testing  of
+antibodies against the  environment of pathogens, recovering
+information  from   pathogen  proteins   by  differentially-
+sampling  antibody  DNA,  and thereby  violate  the  central
+dogma;  maybe  in  the  embryo  in  the  creation  of  eggs;
+because  of the  transporters that  bring antibodies  there.
+Would  nature throw  away this  magnificent construction  of
+externally-validated knowledge?  But  also the immune system
+is the specialized manager of genetic fashion, in the use of
+"fashion" synonymous with game theoretic roshambo, a game of
+knowing the  context ahead  of time  somehow, of  being more
+connected  to the  future ultimately;  less so  than to  the
+past. How to  find that  kernel? Well doesn't it  have these
+dual binding thingies  with the inverse thing  there?  So it
+can take those off the filtered T cells and filter the genes
+of the  immunohistocompatibility complex according  to their
+proteins by  binding the inverse  side to itself,  just like
+the Thymus does a self-binding test.
+
+The  immune system  violates  the central  dogma already  by
+storing generated antibody  DNA differentially in proportion
+to  exposure   to  foreign  proteins. Can  I   put  that  on
+Wikipedia?
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge
@@ -251,7 +295,7 @@ through the  air in  a horizontal  barrage (since  no single
 nucleation point could  crystalize a horizontally-segregated
 group).   There  is  a  systemic  filter  to  remove  global
 knowledge from inputs  supplied to the local  system as well
-as mechanisms to prevent  horizontal information flow within
+as mechanisms  to limit  horizontal information  flow within
 local activity; you are educated stupid in your timecubicle!
 and by the  way it doesn't help  the non-local superordinate
 if  the local  superordinate has  global knowledge. Handling
@@ -263,7 +307,10 @@ enforcement  of  normality vs.  the  ability  to detect  the
 exceptional;  behavioral  control prevents  measurement;  in
 general control prevents measurement; control cannot measure
 what  it also  determines. Trying  to  control people  never
-works for me even when it does.)
+works for me even when  it does. Upshift the phase of anyone
+and they pop right out of these horrible timecrystals like a
+neutrino, as in  nobody notices, don't trust  me because you
+don't want to know.)
 
 The frontal lobe  is the site of the  executive function; it
 is there that  memories of knowledge and  emotions past come
@@ -287,8 +334,8 @@ stressors whether  through reduction in  demanded processing
 or other  mechanisms; if  processing quantity  is to  be the
 only "lever" then it has to have a minimum quantity demanded
 in order to  retain its binding function  reliably; in other
-words once  you drop the  hours down to  20 you end  up with
-MORE retention problems!
+words once you give in and drop the hours down to 20 you end
+up with MORE retention problems!
 
   FOR YOUR FIRST
   EMPLOYER