human-communication.txt

1 files changed, 61 insertions, 43 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index c43b89f..e067a04 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ that the  kernel picks  up each new  environment's knowledge
 and  carries  it  into  the  next  without  losing  what  it
 learned  of  the  previous  environment  --  that  is  their
 robustness. It is the  same as the genetic  principle of DNA
-described  by  Schrodinger  but  most  especially  like  the
+described  by  Schrodinger; but Schrodinger wrote before DNA was discovered; so also before discovery of the structure of controlled mutation in life's environmental sampling mechanism; like in the
 artificially bred/genetically  engineered DNA of  the immune
 system's  antibody-generating  cells. These have  mechanisms
 that control the production of novelty, localizing it to one
@@ -47,44 +47,29 @@ with proof of provenance used  to protect the system against
 foreign novelty  (a single  recognizable DNA strand  that is
 the  same for  every antibody;  that is,  its coded  protein
 has  a strong  chemical  binding to  a  matching protein  in
-the  immunohistocompatibility complex  providing the  filter
+the  immunohistocompatibility complex (an FC receptor); it is the secret that must be known to pass the filter
 mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance). The word kernel  is to
 be  interpreted as  in  the  algebraic structure:  preserved
 across a morphism.
 
-(Computational  phase spaces  means  how many  computational
-states  can  it   cycle  through,  or  how   much  does  the
-novelty-generator  repeat.  Phases  are "upshifted"  to have
-more states  by application  of processing time  to acquired
-knowledge.   A  construction   process  searching  for  more
-efficient structures results in  the discovery of structure;
-the use  of structure to  simplify the generator  makes more
-synapses  available  to  represent more  structure  allowing
-the  search  to  continue  without  consuming  synpases.   A
-compression of  more information into  smaller computational
-structures.  The  generator is  the compressed  structure in
-which  human thought  computation  takes place;  computation
-"behind" compressed  data is  one of  those crazy  math type
-projects most professional programmers  aren't close to, but
-their programs do not generate novelty.)
-
 In  a  literal  kernel,  the  DNA  information  sequence  in
-the  seed's nucleus  is a  literal algebraic  kernel, in  an
-algebra  of sexual  reproduction that  includes a  mechanism
-amplifying  reproductive  success  of  males  in  Eukaryotes
-providing  an  information-accumulation  advantage  by  more
-reliably capturing  novelty, which  was later  jettisoned in
-the  human  lineage  when  Animalia  transitioned  into  the
-Mammalian super-organism phase which  gave the next level of
-meta-advantage in  information accumulation  as group-shared
-emotions   applied   distributed  computation   to   sensory
-information  turning  e.g.  individualized sight  into  area
-surveillance (Eukaryotic sexual  sampling came into conflict
-with high  parental investment  involved in  non-genetic but
-still-vertical transfer of acquired environmental knowledge,
-a  sort  of Lamarckian  epigenetic  thing  if you  are  into
-analogies  YUCK); that  super-organism was  again jettisoned
-when Humanity transitioned into its cultural message-passing
+the  seed's  nucleus  is  a  literal  algebraic  kernel,  in
+an   algebra  of   sexual  reproduction   that  includes   a
+mechanism  amplifying  reproductive   success  of  males  in
+Eukaryotes  providing an  information-accumulation advantage
+by  more reliably  capturing  novelty on  the Y  chromosome,
+which  was  later  jettisoned  in  the  human  lineage  when
+Animalia  transitioned  into  the  Mammalian  super-organism
+phase  which  gave  the  next  level  of  meta-advantage  in
+information  accumulation as  group-shared emotions  applied
+distributed computation to  sensory information turning e.g.
+individualized  sight  into  area  surveillance  (Eukaryotic
+sexual  sampling  came  into  conflict  with  high  parental
+investment  involved   in  non-genetic   but  still-vertical
+transfer  of acquired  environmental  knowledge,  a sort  of
+Lamarckian  epigenetic  thing  if  you  are  into  analogies
+YUCK);  that   super-organism  was  again   jettisoned  when
+Humanity  transitioned  into  its  cultural  message-passing
 super-organism phase (in fact Humanity remains the mammalian
 substrate but  human subjectivity (the "us"  that "we" think
 "we" are  even as  we call ourselves  human) is  produced by
@@ -95,7 +80,29 @@ the  old  systems  always  exist and  indeed  exist  as  the
 foundations of the newer  systems and abstractions are leaky
 and the new stuff only has  to work just-better than the old
 stuff so it isn't ever all the  way there -- you know how it
-goes.
+goes. (There  is always  a  residue  of apparent  randomness
+left unaccounted  for by the locally-known  structure where,
+surely, more structure does exist to be found; though it may
+be unconnectable to the local region.)
+
+(Computational  phase spaces  means  how many  computational
+states  can  it   cycle  through,  or  how   much  does  the
+novelty  generator   repeat.   Phases  are   "upshifted"  to
+have  more  states  by  application of  processing  time  to
+acquired  knowledge.  A  construction process  searching for
+more  efficient  internal  data structures  results  in  the
+discovery of "external" or "objective" structure; the use of
+structure  to simplify  the  generator  makes more  synapses
+available to represent more structure allowing the search to
+continue  without  consuming  synpases.   A  compression  of
+more  information  into  smaller  computational  structures.
+The  generator is  the compressed  structure in  which human
+thought computation  takes place;  a signal  processor; feed
+in  facts  to generate  conclusions  but  feed in  noise  to
+generate imaginations; either way, what is generated will be
+filtered  elsewhere according  to the  present state  of the
+multiple shifting  connections of  the frontal lobe  and its
+external/bodily hormonal-emotional control structures.)
 
 Haskell  monads  show  us  how algebraic  morphisms  are  as
 intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank  you Mr. Quine. But these
@@ -107,7 +114,8 @@ who  think 2+2=4  is simple  may be  remembering the  answer
 rather than  computing it. People  who are computing  it may
 not be  deriving from  foundations; they may  be remembering
 rather than proving a lemma. But to remember without proving
-is not enough to transmit knowledge.
+is not enough to transmit  knowledge. When was the last time
+you taught a child that 2+2=4?
 
 Memory  transmits  only   memory.   Knowledge  can  transmit
 either  memory or  sometimes knowledge.   The recipient  can
@@ -193,13 +201,17 @@ big  picture to  change  their  phase thereby  destabilizing
 their binding  connection to you (creating  a renegotiation,
 reconfiguration, or break).
 
+Love  binds differently;  love  loops horizontal  bandwidth.
+Broadcasts  displacing  horizontal exchanges  displace  love
+possibilities.
+
 By working  backward from  the conclusion  the mathematician
 will construct  a proof  "from both  ends" toward  a middle.
-The conclusion is in sight  before the bridge is built.  The
-fear response precedes the  conclusion.  Loss of the binding
-connection can  produce the fear.   Thus can a  binding lock
-the phases  of the bound.   With some emotions you  can jump
-the gap then you might land on error.
+The conclusion is in sight  long before the bridge is built.
+The  fear response  precedes  the conclusion.   Loss of  the
+binding connection can produce the fear.  Thus can a binding
+lock the phases  of the bound.  (With some  emotions you can
+jump the gap; you might land on error.)
 
 When I was 13  years old I read A Brief  History of Time and
 learned that  Albert Einstein  claimed that  calculus proves
@@ -234,7 +246,14 @@ knowledge from inputs  supplied to the local  system as well
 as mechanisms to prevent  horizontal information flow within
 local activity; you are educated stupid in your timecubicle!
 and by the  way it doesn't help  the non-local superordinate
-if the local superordinate has global knowledge)
+if  the local  superordinate has  global knowledge. Handling
+local  exceptions non-locally  is  good distributed  systems
+design; keeping the  local system simpler by  only making it
+complex  enough to  handle the  most unexceptional  pathway;
+however in  practice the market for  lemons counterfeit game
+theory bla bla everyone is just faking being normal becoming
+a competition to see who can afford to fake being normal; to
+win is to seize the power to exist without being normal.)
 
 There  is the  "BITE"  model of  cult programming,  behavior
 information  thought and  emotion  control; institutions  in
@@ -256,4 +275,3 @@ MORE retention problems!
   A COLLEGE DEGREE
   IS THE ONLY
   DOWRY
-