human-communication.txt

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 46 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index 7200164..31fbf1b 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ systems  that have  phase after  phase to  downshift through
 damage  and heal  from  it by  phase-changing  back up  over
 (computational) time  (rewriting mental programs  to account
 for  unhandled or  mishandled conditions  while keeping  the
-programs  running continuously  in a  degraded state). Human
-cultural  programs  are  far  beyond what  average  or  even
-elite  programmers can  hope  to construct;  they have  been
+programs  running continuously  in a  degraded state). Knock
+out multiple  random chunks, portions of  program degenerate
+into data, and the whole still runs. Human cultural programs
+are far  beyond what average  or even elite  programmers can
+hope  to  construct  in  computer systems;  they  have  been
 constructed by  one-in-a-million prophets  who were  able to
 fully  absorb  their  entire  local  culture  and  reprogram
 themselves  individually based  on reverse  engineering that
@@ -37,9 +39,9 @@ again  and  again in  new  environments  --  in such  a  way
 that the  kernel picks  up each new  environment's knowledge
 and  carries  it  into  the  next  without  losing  what  it
 learned  of  the  previous  environment  --  that  is  their
-robustness. It  is again  and  above  the genetic  principle
-of DNA first described by Schrodinger; but Schrodinger wrote
-before DNA was discovered; so also before discovery of the
+robustness. It is  again and above the  genetic principle of
+DNA first  described by  Schrodinger; but  Schrodinger wrote
+before DNA was  discovered; so also before  discovery of the
 structure  of controlled  mutation  in life's  environmental
 sampling  mechanism; so  again instead  is the  artificially
 bred/genetically  engineered  DNA  of  the  immune  system's
@@ -79,7 +81,7 @@ Humanity  transitioned  into  its  cultural  message-passing
 super-organism phase  where all  Earth life must  survive in
 symbiotic  exchange with  or  as constituent  elements of  a
 single social machine originating chronologically before the
-origination of any biological Earth human (in fact Humanity
+origination of any biological  Earth human (in fact Humanity
 remains the mammalian substrate  but human subjectivity (the
 "us"  that "we"  think "we"  are even  as we  call ourselves
 human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose
@@ -130,20 +132,6 @@ is not enough to transmit  knowledge. When was the last time
 you taught  a child that  2+2=4? Maybe the people  who think
 they know 2+2=4 don't know they're faking.
 
-The thing is  that I didn't prove that there  is a morphism,
-but I  don't have to prove  to know it's there.   Proving it
-would be a matter of writing the program, yet somehow I know
-what can  be proved  without proving  it, because  I somehow
-know whether I can write the program before writing it.  But
-of course  I have  been wrong  before; that  is why  my next
-rhyme style  will be the code  poem. It is funny that  it is
-easier to prove  things to computers than to  humans; it was
-easier for humans to build something to understand them than
-to be understood! but  not really because building computers
-took  50  million  years of  accumulated  culture. Isn't  it
-only  the  accumulated  culture itself  that  the  computers
-understand?
-
 Memory  transmits  only   memory.   Knowledge  can  transmit
 either  memory or  sometimes knowledge.   The recipient  can
 interpret  proof as  information  (store it)  or as  program
@@ -212,11 +200,11 @@ in  multiple  nations  simultaneously,  as  indeed  happened
 in  a  software supply  chain  attack  on Microsoft  through
 their  upstream library  vendor SolarWinds. This  attack was
 relatively harmless because it was performed by a government
-that only wanted  some spy shit rather than one  at war or a
-terrorist  who wanted  to  maximize  destruction).  Time  to
-process.  Can't get the time of day from someone who doesn't
-want to  spend the time  thinking whether you just  want the
-time of day.
+that only wanted some subtle spy  shit rather than an act of
+war or terrorist maximizing destruction, I mean I guess, who
+knows what they did).  Time  to process.  Can't get the time
+of  day from  someone who  doesn't  want to  spend the  time
+thinking whether you just want the time of day.
 
 Capitalism and school might  be seen operationally as denial
 of  service  attacks   on  their  constituent  subordinates'
@@ -259,29 +247,29 @@ expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
 made a movie about that, but it sucked.
 
 The body  could mutate the  immunohistocompatibility complex
-using  genetic  information  derived  from  the  testing  of
-antibodies against the  environment of pathogens, recovering
-information  from   pathogen  proteins   by  differentially-
-sampling  antibody  DNA,  and thereby  violate  the  central
-dogma;  maybe  in  the  embryo  in  the  creation  of  eggs;
-because  of the  transporters that  bring antibodies  there.
-Would  nature throw  away this  magnificent construction  of
-externally-validated knowledge?  But  also the immune system
-is the specialized manager of genetic fashion, in the use of
-"fashion" synonymous with game theoretic roshambo, a game of
-knowing the  context ahead  of time  somehow, of  being more
-connected  to the  future ultimately;  less so  than to  the
-past. How to  find that  kernel? Well doesn't it  have these
-dual binding thingies  with the inverse thing  there?  So it
-can take those off the filtered T cells and filter the genes
-of the  immunohistocompatibility complex according  to their
-proteins by  binding the inverse  side to itself,  just like
-the Thymus does a self-binding test.
+selectively  using  genetic  information  derived  from  the
+testing   of   antibodies   against   the   environment   of
+pathogens,  recovering  information from  pathogen  proteins
+by   differentially-sampling  antibody   DNA;  and   thereby
+violate  the  central dogma;  maybe  in  the embryo  in  the
+creation  of eggs;  because of  the transporters  that bring
+antibodies there.  Would nature  throw away this magnificent
+construction  of   externally-validated  knowledge?   Having
+built already one bridge through the placenta?  But also the
+immune system is the specialized manager of genetic fashion,
+in  the  use of  "fashion"  synonymous  with game  theoretic
+roshambo,  a  game of  knowing  the  context ahead  of  time
+somehow, of  being more connected to  the future ultimately;
+less  so than  to the  past. How to  find that  kernel? Well
+doesn't it have these dual binding thingies with the inverse
+thing there?  So it can take  those off the filtered T cells
+and filter the genes of the immunohistocompatibility complex
+according to their  proteins by binding the  inverse side to
+itself, just like the Thymus does a self-binding test.
 
 The  immune system  violates  the central  dogma already  by
 storing generated antibody  DNA differentially in proportion
-to  exposure   to  foreign  proteins. Can  I   put  that  on
-Wikipedia?
+to its binding strength to foreign proteins.
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge
@@ -322,6 +310,18 @@ reactions  induces  the  brain  to "switch  away"  from  the
 consequences of the present to the narrative sequence of the
 memory and its alternative emotional consequences.
 
+The thing is  that I didn't prove that there  is a morphism,
+but I  don't have to prove  to know.  Proving it  would be a
+matter of writing the program, and somehow I know when I can
+write the program  before writing it.  But of  course I have
+been wrong before;  that is why my next rhyme  style will be
+the code poem. It is funny that it is easier to prove things
+to computers  than to  humans; it was  easier for  humans to
+build something  to understand  them than to  be understood!
+but not  really because  building computers took  50 million
+years of accumulated culture. Isn't  it only the accumulated
+culture itself that the computers understand?
+
 There  is the  "BITE"  model of  cult programming,  behavior
 information  thought and  emotion  control; institutions  in
 order  to  fully  bind  individuals  only  need  to  control