changes

3 files changed, 451 insertions, 144 deletions

diff --git a/human-communication-removals.txt b/human-communication-removals.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ae6c9d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/human-communication-removals.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+[Because knowledge to be "real"  or be "live" in the physical
+brain ("known" as opposed to  merely "imaginable") it has to
+be a  generator of  behaviors; which  means it  has to  be a
+physical form that has energy metabolism in order to satisfy
+its  computational needs;  but of  course not  its own  cell
+membrane; but it does  have its own pure-informational forms
+of membranes]
+
+
+
+
+Erlang-style message-passing; such  a specialist-y thing and
+yet it's the simplest kind of  structure; it must exist in a
+thousand  places; there  must  be a  hundred apt  analogies;
+culture  and  human  society  together form  a  more  robust
+version of the same structure; but  it is only one thing and
+that  is  an  algorithm,  also  known as  a  program,  or  a
+communication  of the  most powerful  sort that  is possible
+between human beings;  and it is one  precise algorithm that
+has  been mathematically  identified, broken  down into  its
+constituent axioms  like a protein into  its originating DNA
+code  points ("up  to isomorphism"...  it's such  a powerful
+concept...), by  the Erlang literature.  And  the reason for
+all  that is  that  it  is the  foundation  of stability  of
+long-running "autophagic"  distributed systems; I  call them
+"tissue"  systems  because  the  cells of  a  living  tissue
+replace themselves similarly.
+
+
+
+
+Like why would  you put literal death into the  movie what a
+fucking  downer, it  doesn't  help how  he  ended up  unlike
+Michael Jackson  where it  works -- like  Man in  the Mirror
+really  works now  in  retrospect.  Robin  Williams went  to
+Julliard which means he  was pretty well socially integrated
+doesn't it so maybe those movies sucked for a reason.
diff --git a/human-communication.txt b/human-communication.txt
index fd30b31..1fa2116 100644
--- a/human-communication.txt
+++ b/human-communication.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-Human Communication
-  or
-Follow the logic of the knowledge
+Human Communication or__ Follow the logic of the knowledge
 
 
 
@@ -8,17 +6,10 @@ Human beings  can transmit to one  another two fundamentally
 different  types of  communication: (1)  data (2)  programs.
 Programs are the same thing as  proofs and the same thing as
 Russellian denotations; they have the "sense" that mere/pure
-data lacks.   They have the  power that data does  not have,
-to transmit  knowledge rather  than information. Information
-creates  knowledge about  transmission  but cannot  transmit
-knowledge, because knowledge  to be "real" or  "live" in the
-physical brain  ("known" as opposed to  merely "imaginable";
-it has to be a generator of behaviors; which means it has to
-be a  physical form that  has energy metabolism in  order to
-satisfy  its  computational  needs;  but of  course  not  an
-"independent" energy  metabolism nor its own  cell membrane;
-but it does  have its own forms  of informational membranes;
-we shall address them.)
+data lacks.  They have the power that data does not have, to
+transmit  knowledge  rather than  information.   Information
+can  /create/ knowledge  (about transmission)  but does  not
+/transmit/ knowledge.
 
 However,  it must  be  understood that  programs are  highly
 sensitive to their runtime  environments and for that reason
@@ -26,24 +17,25 @@ their robustness  is an extremely difficult  problem akin to
 the robustness  of life in natural  habitats. Human cultural
 programs are  high reliability systems which  means they are
 chaotic  systems that  have phase  after phase  to downshift
-through  (articulated joints  through  which  to roll  over)
-as  they take  damage  and heal  from  it by  phase-changing
-back   up  over   (computational)  time   (rewriting  mental
-programs to  account for unhandled or  mishandled conditions
-while  keeping  the  programs   running  continuously  in  a
-degraded state). Knock out  multiple random chunks, portions
-of  program  degenerate  into  data,  and  the  whole  still
-runs. Human cultural programs are far beyond what average or
-even  elite programmers  can hope  to construct  in computer
-systems;  they  have  been constructed  by  one-in-a-million
-prophets  who  were  able   to  fully  absorb  their  entire
-local   culture   and  reprogram   themselves   individually
-based  on   reverse  engineering  that  culture   to  become
-(themselves, as individuals)  generators of self-propagating
-regenerator-generators of  universal culture. Their programs
-are constructed in  such a universal way as  to be rewritten
-generation after  generation according to the  local runtime
-environment,   while  preserving   an  evolving   kernel  to
+through (articulated  joints through which to  roll over) as
+they take  damage and  heal from  it by  phase-changing back
+up  over  (computational)  time (rewriting  mental  programs
+to  account for  unhandled  or  mishandled conditions  while
+keeping  the programs  running  continuously  in a  degraded
+state).   Knock  out  multiple random  chunks,  portions  of
+program degenerate  into data, and  the whole still  runs in
+the designed  way, and  will even  recover the  lost portion
+over  time. Human  cultural  programs are  far  beyond  what
+average or even elite "professional" programmers can hope to
+construct in  computer systems;  they have  been constructed
+by  one-in-a-million   prophets  who  were  able   to  fully
+absorb their  entire local culture and  reprogram themselves
+individually based  on reverse  engineering that  culture to
+become (themselves,  as individual human  beings) generators
+of self-propagating  generators of  universal culture. Their
+programs are  constructed in such  a universal way as  to be
+rewritten generation after generation according to the local
+runtime environment, while preserving  an evolving kernel to
 re-generate slightly adapted kernels  again and again in new
 environments -- in such a way  that the kernel picks up each
 new  environment's knowledge  and carries  it into  the next
@@ -58,13 +50,13 @@ system's  antibody-generating  cells. These have  mechanisms
 that induce the production of  novelty, localizing it to one
 part of  the DNA strand, while  circumscribing every novelty
 with proof of provenance used  to protect the system against
-foreign novelty  (a single  recognizable DNA strand  that is
+foreign novelty.  (A single  recognizable DNA strand that is
 the same for every antibody;  that is, its coded protein has
 a  strong chemical  binding  to a  matching  protein in  the
 immunohistocompatibility complex (an  FC receptor); called a
 transporter, it functions like  a passport -- an unforgeable
 signature  that  must  be   presented  to  pass  the  filter
-mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance). The word kernel  is to
+mechanism of  auto-immune tolerance.) The word kernel  is to
 be interpreted as in the algebraic structure: a generator is
 preserved across a morphism.
 
@@ -88,16 +80,19 @@ thing if  you are into analogies  YUCK.) That super-organism
 in  turn progressively  jettisoned  as Humanity  transitions
 into  its  cultural   message-passing  super-organism  phase
 where  all Earth  life  must survive  in symbiotic  exchange
-with, or  as constituent  elements of, Earth's  unique human
-biosocial ecomachine originating  chronologically before the
-origination of any biological Earth human. (In fact Humanity
-remains the mammalian substrate  but human subjectivity (the
-"us"  that "we"  think "we"  are even  as we  call ourselves
-human) is produced by the cultural distributed program whose
-social systems  of self-preservation dominate  the mammalian
-levers mostly  just by  spacialization --  I mean,  it ain't
-hard);  but remnants  of the  old systems  always exist  and
-indeed exist  as the  foundations of  the newer  systems and
+with,  or  as  constituent  elements  of,  Earth's  singular
+(unique) human/biosocial eco-machine;  a phase of biological
+evolution without any fundamental dependence on sampling the
+environment  through differential  reproduction or  survival
+of  DNA-based life;  originating chronologically  before the
+origination of any biological Earth human.  While biological
+humanity remains the mammalian substrate, human subjectivity
+(the  "us" that  "we" think  "we" are  as we  call ourselves
+human)  is  produced  by the  cultural  distributed  program
+(whose  social  systems  of self-preservation  dominate  the
+mammalian levers mostly just by spacialization -- I mean, it
+ain't hard). But  remnants of  the old systems  always exist
+and indeed exist as the foundations of the newer systems and
 abstractions are  leaky and the  new stuff only has  to work
 just-better  than the  old stuff  so it  isn't ever  all the
 way  there --  you  know  how it  goes. (There  is always  a
@@ -107,25 +102,27 @@ exist to  be found;  though it may  be unconnectable  to the
 local region.)
 
 (Computational  phase spaces  means  how many  computational
-states  can  it   cycle  through,  or  how   much  does  the
-novelty  generator   repeat.   Phases  are   "upshifted"  to
-have  more  states  by  application of  processing  time  to
-acquired  knowledge.  A  construction process  searching for
-more  efficient  internal  data structures  results  in  the
-discovery of "external" or "objective" structure; the use of
-structure  to simplify  the  generator  makes more  synapses
-available to represent more structure allowing the search to
-continue  without  consuming  synpases.   A  compression  of
-more  information  into  smaller  computational  structures.
-The  generator is  the compressed  structure in  which human
-thought computation  takes place;  a signal  processor; feed
-in  facts  to generate  conclusions  but  feed in  noise  to
-generate imaginations; either way, what is generated will be
-filtered  elsewhere according  to the  present state  of the
-multiple  shifting  connections  of  the  frontal  lobe  and
-its  external/bodily  hormonal-emotional  Mammalian  control
-structures. The  cultural super-organism  will surely  be to
-Mammalia as Eukarya to the microbial mats.)
+states can  it cycle through,  or how much does  the novelty
+generator  repeat.   Phases  are "upshifted"  to  have  more
+states  by  application  of   processing  time  to  acquired
+knowledge.   A  construction   process  searching  for  more
+efficient internal data structures  results in the discovery
+of  "external"  or  "objective" structure  in  "the  world";
+the  use  of  data   structure  to  simplify  the  generator
+makes  more  synapses  available,  allowing  the  search  to
+make  progress without  consuming  synpases.  A  compression
+of  more information  into smaller  computational structures
+increases its  speed and provides new  logical and emotional
+connectivities.  The  generator is the  compressed structure
+in  which human  thought computation  takes place;  a signal
+processor; feed  in facts  to generate conclusions  but feed
+in  noise  to generate  imaginations;  either  way, what  is
+generated  will  be  filtered  elsewhere  according  to  the
+present state  of the  multiple shifting connections  of the
+frontal  lobe  and  its  external/bodily  hormonal-emotional
+Mammalian  control  structures. The cultural  super-organism
+will  surely be  to  Mammalia as  Eukarya  to the  microbial
+mats.)
 
 Haskell  monads  show  us  how algebraic  morphisms  are  as
 intuitive as quasiquotation. Thank  you Mr. Quine. But these
@@ -159,20 +156,18 @@ side-effects   like  inducing   speculative  investment   in
 external investigative  exploration. The basic  framework is
 of  an   information-gathering  future-predictor-controller;
 reprogramming  it  involves  loops  through  to  the  world;
-
-Erlang-style message-passing; such  a specialist-y thing and
-yet it's the simplest kind of  structure; it must exist in a
-thousand places; there must be  a hundred apt analogies; but
-it is only one thing and that is an algorithm, or a program,
-or  a  communication  of  the most  powerful  sort  that  is
-possible  between  human  beings;  and it  is  that  precise
-algorithm  that has  been mathematically  identified, broken
-down into  its constituent  axioms like  a protein  into its
-originating DNA code points,  by the Erlang literature.  And
-the reason  for all  that is  that it  is the  foundation of
-stability of long-running  "autophagic" distributed systems;
-I call them  "tissue" systems because the cells  of a living
-tissue replace themselves similarly.
+reprogramming it involves loops  through to the world; these
+loops through the  world seem so confusing  to people trying
+to learn Erlang  that it seems like I should  try to explain
+them!  But there is no time,  so I will sum up: the progam's
+self is  a message but the  self is virtual, the  self is an
+experiment, and the self needs to be destroyed.  First, make
+a copy, then collide it with  the world (your body will also
+collide) then compare its  shape to the original.  Collision
+provides knowledge to decide whether  to destroy the copy or
+destroy the original.   What is not destroyed  can be copied
+into another node.  It  works because neighboring nodes pick
+up dropped messages.  It wouldn't work if they competed.
 
 (Knowledge  can exist  in  a degraded,  not-fully-replicable
 form;  neutered, locally  contained,  but potentially  still
@@ -217,9 +212,10 @@ their  upstream library  vendor SolarWinds. This  attack was
 relatively harmless because it was performed by a government
 that only wanted some subtle spy  shit rather than an act of
 war or terrorist maximizing destruction, I mean I guess, who
-knows what they did).  Time  to process.  Can't get the time
-of  day from  someone who  doesn't  want to  spend the  time
-thinking whether you just want the time of day.
+knows  what they  did.   Luckily they  didn't  get into  the
+innermost kernel of human culture.)  Time to process.  Can't
+get  the time  of day  from someone  who doesn't  spend time
+thinking whether you really just want the time of day.
 
 Capitalism and school might  be seen operationally as denial
 of  service  attacks   on  their  constituent  subordinates'
@@ -239,19 +235,27 @@ By working  backward from  the conclusion  the mathematician
 will construct  a proof  "from both  ends" toward  a middle.
 The conclusion is in sight  long before the bridge is built.
 The  fear response  precedes  the conclusion.   Loss of  the
-binding connection  in the  imaginary can produce  the fear.
+binding connection  in the imaginary can  produce fear.  The
+fear emotion  can deactivate the  search for the  next step.
 Thus can a binding lock the  phase of the bound.  (With some
 emotions you can jump the gap; you might land on error.)
 
-Wasn't  Foucault's   point  in  the  History   of  Sexuality
-vol. 3 that  the cultural  practice of  copying prohibitions
-disguises the intentional  construction of positive desires?
-Auto-immune   tolerance   isn't  accomplished   by   copying
-prohibitions  into  new  generators  (pruning  their  search
-trees)  but  by  filtering  already-existing  generators  of
-novelty either  into places  where they  will be  allowed to
-generate further or  else places where they  can be recycled
-as energy.
+Foucault  said  in  History  of Sexuality  Vol. 3  that  the
+cultural  practice  of  copying prohibitions  disguises  the
+intentional construction  of positive  desires.  Auto-immune
+tolerance  isn't accomplished  by copying  prohibitions into
+new generators (pruning their search trees) but by filtering
+already-existing  generators of  novelty either  into places
+where  they will  be  allowed to  generate  further or  else
+places  where  they can  be  recycled  as energy.   However,
+it  all  takes  place  in a  context  where  the  generators
+are  always-already  "pruned"  because they  are  raised  in
+a  "whitelist"  type  environment   where  the  elements  of
+composition  are  provided;   and  composing  with  elements
+not  provided is  made  unthinkable.   A "blacklist"  filter
+algorithm is in principle able  to be much more liberal than
+a "whitelist" one; which is to say it empowers unpredictable
+generators, who potentially shift the phase of the whole.
 
 The search tree of the mental  generator does not need to be
 pruned if  you can  exploit the  mind's lack  of idempotence
@@ -262,27 +266,36 @@ search breadth and encounter a  big picture view.  Maybe the
 point  is,  instead  of thinking  about  which  prohibitions
 are  copied, or  which generated  outputs are  pruned, think
 about  which  generators  get destroyed  or  prevented  from
-running.  Most  places in society can't  allow unpredictable
-people, which  means most people  in most places need  to be
-impervious to  reason. Society needs  filters to  find these
-people.  Once found, they can be put into positions of power
+running.  Each generator is  a unique program (or algorithm)
+that in  principle can be identified  mathematically ("up to
+isomorphism");  in  practice we  could  at  least name  some
+categories.
+
+Most  places in  society can't  allow unpredictable  people,
+which means most people in most places need to be impervious
+to reason. Society  needs filters to identify  these people.
+Once identified,  they can  be put  into positions  of power
 where  they will  behave as  predicted by  those who  get to
 put  people into  places;  subordinate  generators will  not
 interfere with superordinate generators because they will be
-constructed  by  selection  to  be always  trapped  in  some
-local thought system. Foucault was  the historian of thought
-systems and  that is very  abstract and powerful yes  like a
-true mathematician  with rigor (!!)  but we still  care more
-about the people in the systems than the systems and want to
-go back to that mammal  meat perspective where we might feel
-something.  But  the people aren't "in"  the thought system;
-they're  products  of  the  thought  system;  they're  in  a
-social message exchange  network that is a  system; and that
-system propagates social  network extension prohibitions not
-necessarily by explicit prohibitory  rules /nor/ by any kind
-of /management/  of desire (though that  may be attempted!),
-but  by occupying  all time  where unmanaged  bindings could
-form.
+constructed by selection to be  always trapped in some local
+thought system.  The generator is apparently blanket-trained
+to run only in  specific contexts; spontaneous generation in
+the /general/ context is the unthinkable: it's logging in as
+root!  Developing on the production server!
+
+Foucault was  the historian of  thought systems and  that is
+very  abstract and  powerful yes  like a  true mathematician
+with rigor (!!)  but we still care more about  the people in
+the systems  than the systems  and want  to go back  to that
+mammal meat perspective where  we might feel something.  But
+the people aren't "in"  the thought system; they're products
+of the thought system; they're  in a social message exchange
+network that is a system;  and that system propagates social
+network extension  prohibitions not necessarily  by explicit
+prohibitory  rules  /nor/ by  any  kind  of /management/  of
+desire (though that may be attempted!), but by occupying all
+time where unmanaged bindings could form.
 
 When I was  in middle school I read A  Brief History of Time
 and  learned  that  Albert Einstein  claimed  that  calculus
@@ -300,13 +313,9 @@ Only then will  they be permitted a chance to  compete for a
 seat at the  mic where some lucky MC gets  to spit something
 new  on top.   You're not  there yet  kiddo, integrate  this
 expression.  But  don't integrate  too far.   Robin Williams
-made a  movie about it, but  it sucked.  Like why  would you
-put literal death  into the movie what a  fucking downer, it
-doesn't help how he ended up unlike Michael Jackson where it
-works like Man in the Mirror really works now in retrospect.
-Robin Williams  went to Julliard  which means he  was pretty
-well socially  integrated doesn't  it so maybe  those movies
-sucked for a reason.
+made a movie  about it, but it sucked.   Robin Williams went
+to  Juilliard  (he was  deeply  integrated  into the  social
+mainstream) so maybe those movies sucked for a reason.
 
 Somehow  it  does  not  matter what  is  the  material  that
 is   taught;  the   effect  is   never  felt. When   I  read
@@ -318,9 +327,10 @@ they just  need to  keep the volume  high and  the frequency
 constant? I evaded  mind control  by skipping  their reading
 and doing  my own. If the bandwidth  control is sufficiently
 tight then you  can safely be given  /anything/ to skim-read
-and  semi-process without  ever feeling  what you  are doing
-enough to become unpredictable.   Just prove you can; thirty
-hours a week for eight years in a row; then you'll be ready.
+and semi-process without ever feeling anything from what you
+are doing  enough to  become unpredictable.  Just  prove you
+can; thirty  hours a  week for  eight years  in a  row; then
+you'll be ready.
 
 The body  could mutate the  immunohistocompatibility complex
 selectively  using  genetic  information  derived  from  the
@@ -335,17 +345,18 @@ built  already one  bridge  through the  placenta?  But  the
 immune system is the specialized manager of genetic fashion,
 in  the  use of  "fashion"  synonymous  with game  theoretic
 roshambo,  rock  paper  scissors,  a game  of  knowing  some
-ephemeral context;  disposable knowledge; maybe  some kernel
+ephemeral context;  disposable knowledge. Maybe  some kernel
 worth saving can be extracted.
 
 The  immune system  violates  the central  dogma already  by
 storing generated antibody  DNA differentially in proportion
-to  its binding  strength  to foreign  proteins.  The  whole
-purpose  of  the  adaptive   immune  system  is  to  extract
-information from  protein.  It  is a  protein-sensory organ.
-It  derives the  underivable  using  a horizontal  knowledge
-connection.  It breaks through // un ex pex tid lee like the
-Wu.   Hack the  genome.   Get to  know  someone.
+to its binding strength to foreign proteins.
+
+The  whole  purpose of  the  adaptive  immune system  is  to
+extract information  from protein.  It is  a protein-sensory
+organ.   It  derives  the  underivable  using  a  horizontal
+knowledge transmission.  It breaks through // like the Wu //
+un ex pex tid lee.  Hack the genome.  Get to know someone.
 
 (Schools follow the  corporate hierarchy style proof-of-work
 knowledge  distribution  system  of  transferring  knowledge
@@ -395,9 +406,9 @@ mathematicians or  programmers or anybody but  to spend time
 analyzing  concrete  possibilities  for  reconfiguration  of
 local resources,  whereby the basic abstract  structures and
 shapes  will be  realized  in the  concrete  forms of  their
-combinations. However if  you were  a shape  builder serious
-about  building shapes  then you  would want  to know  about
-shapes in their most general form as I am and do.
+combinations. However if  you were  a serious  shape builder
+you would  want to know  about shapes in their  most general
+form as I am and do.
 
 The thing is  that I didn't prove that there  is a morphism,
 but I  don't have to prove  to know.  Proving it  would be a
@@ -460,14 +471,24 @@ prohibitions!)
 
 If I was  right about the uterus then they'd  talk about me.
 Someone would read  this.  It would be, like,  big. But if I
-was right about the prophets that wouldn't change anything.
-
-If someone  really wanted to  be a body without  organs they
-would just put in the time.   Yet probably if they ever came
-to learn about that then they already made the opposite time
-commitment.  Either  way someone  already made  the opposite
-time  commitment on  their behalf  before they  were born. A
-person's foes shall be they of their own household.
+was right about the  prophets that wouldn't change anything.
+I feel the opposite way though.
+
+Someone who really wanted to  be a body without organs would
+put in the  time.  Yet if they encountered  the body without
+organs  concept then  they probably  made the  opposite time
+commitment.  Either way, someone else made the opposite time
+commitment on their behalf before they were born. A person's
+foes shall be they of their own household.
+
+It's like how  if someone hates you because  they don't know
+anything about you, it's that they don't know anything about
+you because they  hate you.  If you want your  beliefs to be
+path independent  then you  commit yourself  to continuously
+re-evaluating the whole. Either you commit to idempotence or
+not. Either you  commit to path independence,  or you commit
+to a path.  It's not  a prohibition; it's a time commitment.
+If you don't spend your time that way then you didn't do it.
 
 There  is the  "BITE"  model of  cult programming,  behavior
 information  thought and  emotion  control; institutions  in
diff --git a/misc.txt b/misc.txt
index 95ab8c3..2a57d0d 100644
--- a/misc.txt
+++ b/misc.txt
@@ -106,14 +106,54 @@ CAN EVADE CONTROL.
 
 
 A university is an Erlang-style message passing system for academic
-knowledge accumulation's life-system to regenerate itself.
-
-
-
-Key point for Deleuze is that the "counter-effectuation" is Max Ent
-physics rather than quantum physics woo.
-
-Bayesian statistical knowledge deriving from information theory.
+knowledge accumulation's cultural life-system to regenerate itself.
+
+
+
+Key point for Deleuze is that the "counter-effectuation" is actually
+real-life really-physical Max Ent physics rather than quantum physics
+analogy/woo.  Bayesian statistical knowledge deriving from information
+theory.
+
+
+Deleuze didn't understand quantum physics correctly but it turns out
+that it doesn't matter because quantum physics doesn't have anything to
+do with metaphysics.  It's only that Uncertainty forces human beings
+to adopt a de-centralizing de-totalizing Copernican mental shift.  But
+it doesn't even do it in the way that is most relevant to metaphysics.
+There is also the de-centralizing de-totalizing Copernican mental
+shift of INTUITIONIST MATHEMATICS.
+
+Back to physics: Deleuze understood the main point: that particles
+are merely virtual constructs while these "interaction events" are
+the actual reality available to advanced physics -- the particles are
+virtual constructs that exist only in the human 3D mental model which
+is definitely NOT the same as the physical universe -- this is one of
+those places where we see the difference -- but the physical universe in
+making individual particles places where information access is limited
+fundamentally because the boundary between one particle and another with
+which it interacts isn't so much illusory as the only real thing, while
+the non-boundary is illusory.
+
+Quantum physics DOES imply a macro universe where macro assemblies
+of particles also have limited access to information; but the actual
+universe we see has EVEN MORE limitations on access to information,
+they are much much stricter than Uncertainty, and therefore we see much
+less information embedded in physical objects than Uncertainty allows
+in its theoretical maximum.  (Physics experiments can be set up so
+that information is not lost; but life in general is always balancing
+loss of information against energy expenditure.)  Max Ent physics and
+Bayesian statistics are mathematical/physical approaches to calculating
+the information available at a given spacetime location.  However, part
+of the nature of quantum uncertainty AND max ent physics is that, from
+WITHIN the system, the limitations apply to the observer and the limits
+are self-referential in the sense that the limitations that apply to an
+observer's disability to have information from other spacetime points
+can include the disability to know which information is available!
+I.e., the theory produces known unknowns.  The fact that there are
+spacetime points in the universe where knowledge of mathematics does
+not exist or exists at a merely undergrad level, means also unknown
+unknowns.
 
 
 
@@ -304,3 +344,212 @@ loop.  Human culture is the only chemical reaction not known to loop or
 terminate.  Human culture is the only true "irrational number" of all
 discretely-instantiated numbers.
 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Tue Oct 31 01:23:16 PM EDT 2023
+
+Feynman and practicing with a different box of tools
+
+Same idea as the Max Ent explanation of prophecy
+
+But also the same idea as parable of the falling seeds, reversed in
+time; the seeds unfall to the sower, and depending on seed origin
+(fertile soil, or barren) the sower becomes either someone who can farm
+or someone who knows what it means to be unable to farm.  The knowledge
+passes from the earth through the seed into the farmer; the seeds
+provide the connection.  The disabled would-be-farmer is disconnected
+from that knowledge even though he too has and sews seeds.  His seeds,
+though sewn, fail to connect out to knowledge from the past and he may
+therefore fail to connect himself out to intentions from the future (or
+else not even form them).
+
+
+
+The 20th century was spent correlating the implications of a physical
+limit of the speed of light.
+
+The 21st century will be spent correlating the implications of
+the physical limits of the speed and size of computations.
+
+The human being as a computer system undering phase changes as the
+computer gains the ability to represent different types of state -- or
+to represent state with different performance characteristics -- through
+acquisition of data structures copied from the environment -- OR from
+internal processing and DISCOVERY of NEW data structures.
+
+These data structures are PASSED BETWEEN HUMANS who learn them
+implicitly and pick them up and play with them.  But data structures
+are unsafe when EXECUTED AS REASON and for this reason human beings
+have SYSTEMS OF ACCESS CONTROL to HUMAN REASON both internal to their
+minds (e.g., concepts of valid and invalid authorities) and external as
+social environment.  Society imposes economic exploitation which causes
+evolutionary adapations to "bubble up" in ways that are UNPREDICTABLE
+IN DETAIL (chaos theory) but according to evolutionary theory will tend
+to produce EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTATION so that it will converge
+to the computer systems we find most advanced as well as the biological
+systems of generating and filtering novelty that we find most advanced
+(except that the search space may have valleys etc).
+
+Another system of access control is RUNNING IN EMULATION this is when
+the individual learns enough about a foreign system to execute the steps
+of its reasoning without however being allowed to reach any conclusions
+that apply to the larger brain's data structures.  There are two reasons
+why humans cannot rely on this mechanism primarily.
+
+First, EMULATION CAN BE JAILBROKEN; this cannot ever be as secure.
+
+Second, more importantly, RUNNING IN EMULATION IS COMPUTATIONALLY MORE
+EXPENSIVE.  Even though CPUs and apparently also human beings have mechanisms
+to optimize emulation, in human beings especially, these cannot obtain
+"native" performance.  Therefore, computational emulators (e.g.,
+learners of a second language) cannot "actually" perform as well as
+computational originators (e.g., learners of a first language) if they
+use the same underlying computational equipment for the same amount of
+time.
+
+But human beings do not all have the same underlying computational
+equipment; and they do not all apply the same amount of time to
+processing it.  In the real world, running the other side in emulation
+is something that more intelligent, more informed, or more adult human
+beings attempt to do when interacting with less intelligent, informed,
+or adult ones.  Human beings may also believe they are running the other
+side in emulation, when they are running a gross simplification; in
+fact, they are running a gross simplification even when they run the
+remote side natively, since they always still have to emulate the entire
+remote environment(!) which is where the real problems start.
+
+Non-portability of language between individuals is a major problem.
+Before the internet, locality constraints on communications caused
+portability to self-organize locally; but the internet has changed
+communication patterns so that every person experiences a kind of
+cosmopolis without totality.  Every experience is a scene from a virtual
+city which is a construct only of that experience; each event and
+corresponding city co-singular; co-existing only once without object
+permanence.
+
+One problem is the human tendency to imagination, roleplay, etc.,
+causes human beings to pretend communication incompatibilities are
+not real.  Human beings must surely have evolved under circumstances
+where perceived universality of linguistic forms was vastly more
+common than it is today in the adult internet-connected world, though
+perhaps less common than it is today in the world of the schoolchild
+or university student or professor.
+
+The professors may not make the same naive/incorrect excuses as children
+for failing to communicate; their perspectives will be more realistic;
+the university system as a whole is constrained in certain ways to
+succeed in transmitting information; but insofar as these transmissions
+fail, are the reasons understood from a rational information-theoretic
+perspective?  Or is it a primate emotion static control program designed
+to regulate subordinate behavior emotionally, amplifying the causal
+force of the intentions of individuals positioned in social hierarchies
+such that their anger generates fear in others?  Or is it a whole series
+of task-activated network programs, each one separately influenced
+by its own emotional context?  Perhaps they are constrained by
+environmental demands to understand these failures operationally
+
+
+The task-activated networks seem to be the neurological place of
+mental compartmentalization; and the ADHD don't shut off the DMN when
+activating TANs.  We still "see" the task when others are absorbed
+"in" the task.  Of course, in order to influence the DMN, it would
+have to be activated.  The TANs feed back into the DMN in ADHD, which
+allows the ADHD brain to generate totalizing connectivities by putting
+information from disparate parts of universe into the same local
+computational system; where for the non-ADHD these same components,
+though contained within one BRAIN, are not connected into the same
+integrated computational system; the TANs are prevented from feeding
+back into the DMN which allows mental compartmentalization to prevent
+information from one controlled system to produce interference in
+another controlled system when each controlled system is controlling the
+same physical human being with a different control algorithm.
+
+In other words, the DMN or the big picture understanding does not
+help with, but interferes with, TAN activity downstream of power
+in the social grid, because of the way in which this activity is
+structured to depend on human beings as removable components,
+keeping the environment highly-controlled.  General intelligence is
+not useful in highly-controlled environments until they begin to
+break down.  High-efficiency local computation requires discarding
+global information in order to maximize local connectivity of the
+processed information and thus processing speed.  (Principle of
+cache locality.)  So as optimization proceeds, the big picture is
+squeezed out of every local environment; except SOME privileged local
+environment has to be preserved in order to manage the organism's
+interaction with _environments_ themselves; this is the executive.
+The organism has a consciousness of multiple discrete environments;
+each environment controlled by some local control system; each local
+control system incorporating its own different own model of human
+emotion and behavior as necessary to sustain its specific local
+constraints
+
+Emotions are the foundational social control levers in humans.  Not
+life/reproduction directly, as it would be in the case of domestic
+plants; but emotion/physical-reproduction-of-imaginary-will plays
+the same structural role, allowing animalia the meta-evolutionary
+advantage of evolving without biological death; emotional sampling with
+differential reproduction of imaginations replaces eukaryotic sampling
+with differential reproduction of offspring in the information-gathering
+social super-organisms of mammalia).
+
+In a school, a student convincing their teacher that they do not belong
+in the space to which they are assigned is NOT sufficient to liberate
+the student from the space; only a non-local authority assigning
+them to some other space can liberate the student from the local
+space.  The student having the level of understanding of the system
+that would cause them to make this conclusion correctly tends to make
+the student even less able to perform in a space where they do not
+belong; if the student instead internalizes a false simplified local
+model in which the possibility of mis-spacialization is impossible by
+construction, then the student may have a better chance of passing
+through the filters imposed by the environment for reaching a more
+appropriate spacialization.  If the student internalizes a more
+realistic, more complete, but externally-referencing (non-local)
+model, then compatibility issues are likely in communication with
+their teacher; if compatibility exists between the teacher and the
+student, then the compatibility issue will exist between the teacher and
+administration; or else the administration will have issues with the
+school board; or the electoral system; or else the local municipality
+itself will drain tax funding since diaspora from other schools will
+collect locally.  At every possible avenue where the "exception" could
+"bubble up", there will be an incompatible interface, because the
+system attempts to impose a constraint that exceptions are handled
+non-locally.  All biological systems impose this constraint because of
+how it produces a superorganism that is more intelligent and robust than
+if its individual components were individually intelligent and robust.
+Advanced decentralized computing systems also impose this constraint; it
+is a foundational principle of Erlang.
+
+Another principle important probably is that in order to learn a lot
+of things you ought to be independently generating them yourself;
+the fact that someone has generated something and transmitted it to
+someone else does does not mean that they transmitted the generator;
+transmitting the generator between people may have more to do with
+copying the environment in which the independent generation occurred;
+mathematics provides students an environment in which to independently
+re-discover the fundamental theorems; but mathematical education outside
+of universities does not seem to understand this principle even in
+schools that feed top universities.  Students are fed the theorems to
+memorize and use without even being fed the raw material from which
+the theorems were originally derived.  Thus they are optimizing to
+demonstrate a false affectation of mathematical education.  Gresham's
+Law again.  Erlang illustrates the structure of passing the generator as
+well as the data.
+
+
+Tue Oct 31 01:59:34 PM EDT 2023
+
+Rappers are only really good at styling up content that they copy from
+other places.  They generate novelty only in style, they do not generate
+novel content.  Novel content is generated places other than hiphop and
+then incorporated there.  People who are competing in social spaces
+for the best content do not put that content in hiphop style.  People
+competing in social spaces with hiphop style are not competing on
+content and do not bring dense content into the competition.
+
+
+